ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
An evolutionary systematic framework to quantify short-term and long-term watershed ecological compensation standard and amount for promoting sustainability of livestock industry based on cost-benefit analysis, linear programming, WTA and WTP method.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing pathways for glycine betaine in cross-domain ecological restoration: a bibliometric analysis.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Impacts of Incentive and Disincentive Mechanisms for Ensuring Environmentally Friendly Livestock Waste Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Construction of Resource Ecological Compensation Mechanism Model under Rural Leisure Sports Environment.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to achieve at better water quality of a given trans-boundary river mainly contributed by high-intensive and spatially dispersed pig farming at upstream area, an effective ecological compensation system is in urgent need. In this study, an evolutionary bottom-up framework of ecological compensation system was proposed to analyze the tradeoffs of behavior among the pig farmers, government of upstream area, and government of downstream area. Shutting down pig farms, upgrading traditional piggeries to elevated bed piggeries, and adopting centralized facilities for disposing wastes from small-scale pig farms are three effective measures to control pollution from pig farming and were considered into this study. The combined use of cost-benefit analysis, linear programming, willingness to accept and willingness to pay method, and its application to a typical case of Jiuzhou River, China, showed good performance to quantify short-term and long-term watershed ecological compensation standard and amount for promoting sustainability of livestock industry. Besides, we also proposed a framework of long-term reward and punishment compensation mechanism binding upon both sides for maintaining good water quality. The proposed systematic and feasible framework of methodology has important theoretical and application significance for other similar related researches and enriched the field in paying for good water quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33403639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.