Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403629›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Supplying honey bees with waterers: a precautionary measure to reduce exposure to pesticides.

Frédéric McCune, Olivier Samson-Robert, Sabrina Rondeau, Madeleine Chagnon, Valérie Fournier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Supplying honey bees with waterers: a precautionary measure to reduce exposure to pesticides.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frédéric McCuneCentre de recherche et d'innovation sur les végétaux, Université Laval, QC, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada. frederic.mccune.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-6580
Olivier Samson-RobertCentre de recherche et d'innovation sur les végétaux, Université Laval, QC, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Sabrina RondeauCentre de recherche et d'innovation sur les végétaux, Université Laval, QC, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Madeleine ChagnonDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Valérie FournierCentre de recherche et d'innovation sur les végétaux, Université Laval, QC, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Université Laval · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

Prime-Vert; Volet 4 - Appui au développement et au transfert de connaissances en agroenvironnement of the Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ) LAVA-1-13-1690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water is essential for honey bees (Apis mellifera L.), but contaminated sources of water in agricultural environments represent a risk of exposure to potentially harmful contaminants. Providing clean water to honey bees could be an efficient and cost-effective measure for beekeepers to reduce bee mortality associated with pesticides and improve the health of their colonies. The main goal of this study was to design a waterer prototype to fulfill the water requirements of honey bees and to evaluate the potential of this waterer in improving colonies' health in agricultural settings, through mitigating the possible impact of an exposure to pesticides from puddle water. We tested the preference of honey bees regarding water composition and waterer prototypes, among which honey bees showed a strong preference for salted water and a poultry-type waterer. Our waterer models were quickly adopted and intensively used through the season in both the context of honey production in field crops and pollination services in cranberry crops. However, in neither context did the use of waterers reduce worker mortality nor increase overall colony weight. Our waterers provided bees with water containing fewer pesticides and were associated with reduced risks of drowning compared to natural sources of water. Our study suggests that the use of waterers fulfills an important requirement for honey bees and represents an interesting and convenient precautionary measure for beekeepers.

Indexed as

HoneyInsecticidesPesticidesAgricultureAnimalsBeesCrops, AgriculturalNeonicotinoidsPollinationInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPesticidesClothianidinColony performanceHerbicidesNeonicotinoidsThiamethoxamWater foraging

Identifiers

PMID33403629
OpenAlexW3120118264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.