Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403562›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Transhepatic Direct Approach to the "Limit of the Division of the Hepatic Ducts" Leads to a High R0 Resection Rate in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Takehiro Noji, Kimitaka Tanaka, Aya Matsui, Yoshitsugu Nakanishi, Toshimichi Asano, Toru Nakamura, Takahiro Tsuchikawa, Keisuke Okamura, Satoshi Hirano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takehiro NojiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. drnoji@med.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-0685
Kimitaka TanakaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Aya MatsuiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Yoshitsugu NakanishiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Toshimichi AsanoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Toru NakamuraFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Takahiro TsuchikawaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Keisuke OkamuraFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that curative resection (R0 resection) was among the most crucial factors for the long-term survival of patients with PHCC. To achieve R0 resection, we performed the transhepatic direct approach and resection on the limits of division of the hepatic ducts. Although a recent report showed that the resection margin (RM) status impacted PHCC patients' survival, it is still unclear whether RM is an important clinical factor.

objectiveTo describe a technique of transhepatic direct approach and resection on the limit of division of hepatic ducts, investigate its short-term surgical outcome, and validate whether the radial margin (RM) would have a clinical impact on long-term survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) patients.

methodsConsecutive PHCC patients (n = 211) who had undergone major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, without pancreaticoduodenectomy, in our department were retrospectively evaluated.

resultsR0 resection rate was 92% and 86% for invasive cancer-free and both invasive cancer-free and high-grade dysplasia-free resection, respectively. Overall 5-year survival rate was 46.9%. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (> 7.0 mg/dl), pathological lymph node metastasis, and portal vein invasion were independent risk factors, but R status on both resection margin and bile duct margin was not an independent risk factor for survival.

conclusionThe transhepatic direct approach to the limits of division of the bile ducts leads to the highest R0 resection rate in the horizontal margin of PHCC. Further examination will be needed to determine the adjuvant therapy for PHCC to improve patient survival.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaKlatskin TumorHepatectomyHepatic Duct, CommonHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLimit of dividing of the bile ductPerihilar cholangiocarcinomaR0 resection rateSurgical techniqueTranshepatic direct approach

Identifiers

PMID33403562
OpenAlexW3119022901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.