ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2021
Central venous-to-arterial CO
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of COAnnals of intensive care · 2025Review
- The Role of Venous Blood Gas Analysis in Critical Care: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Lactate and COFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Association of the central venousFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Pathophysiology and clinical implications of the veno-arterial PCOCritical care (London, England) · 2021Review
- ΔPCOFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Correlation of venous to arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference with other cardiac output indices in patients undergoing intracardiac repair for tetralogy of fallot.Annals of cardiac anaesthesiaObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (CO
methodsA retrospective study was conducted of 5,151 patients from our departmental database who underwent cardiac surgery from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Lactate level (mmol·L
resultsThere were 1,933 patients (38%) with an adverse outcome. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) parameters were similar between groups. The CO
conclusionAfter cardiac surgery with CPB, the CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.