Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403460›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2021

MR-Guided High-Intensity Directional Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer.

Samuel J Galgano, Virginia B Planz, Sandeep Arora, Soroush Rais-Bahrami

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel J GalganoDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA. samuelgalgano@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-9950
Virginia B PlanzDepartment of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sandeep AroraDepartment of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Soroush Rais-BahramiDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goal of this paper was to review the novel treatment modality of high-intensity transurethral directional ultrasound for prostate cancer. RECENT

findingsProstate cancer is a heterogeneous disease with some patients electing for active surveillance and focal therapies instead of definitive treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Prostate MRI has become a cornerstone of prostate cancer diagnosis, targeted biopsy, and treatment planning. Transurethral high-intensity directional ultrasound allows for MRI-guided ablation of the prostate gland with the ability to contour boundaries and spare critical structures, such as the neurovascular bundle and urinary sphincter. Although results are still emerging, this may offer patients a new option for focal therapy with a favorable side-effect profile. High-intensity transurethral directional ultrasound is an emerging treatment modality for both whole-gland and focal ablation with promising early results. Further research is needed to establish safety, tolerability, and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationTransurethral Resection of ProstateBiopsyCystoscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeAblationFocal therapyHigh-intensity ultrasoundProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.