Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403448›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2021

Role of Chewing Gum in Reducing Postoperative Ileus after Reversal of Ileostomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Samiullah Bhatti, Yusra Jahangir Malik, Shabbar Hussain Changazi, Usman Ali Rahman, Awais Amjad Malik, Usman Ismat Butt, Muhammad Umar, Muhammad Waris Farooka, Mahmood Ayyaz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07144969 (Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07144969 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo Hospital LahoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsIleostomy Closure, Gum Chewing, Honey, Postoperative RecoveryArmsHoney, gum chewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samiullah BhattiServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Yusra Jahangir MalikMayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shabbar Hussain ChangaziServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. shabbarchangazi246@gmail.com.
Usman Ali RahmanGhulab Devi Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Awais Amjad MalikLahore General Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Usman Ismat ButtServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad UmarServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Waris FarookaServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mahmood AyyazServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Services Hospital · PKServices Institute of Medical Sciences · PKLahore General Hospital · PKMayo Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative ileus is one of the most prevalent and troublesome problems after any elective or emergency laparotomy. Gum chewing has emerged as a new and simple modality for decreasing postoperative ileus. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of chewing gum in reducing postoperative ileus in terms of passage of flatus and total length of hospital stay. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted in department of surgery, Services Hospital Lahore, between November 2013 and November 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: chewing gum (Group A) and no chewing gum (Group B). Starting 6 h after the operation, Group A patients were asked to chew gum for 30 min every 8 h; bowel sounds, passage of flatus and total length of hospital stay were noted. Outcome measures such as passage of flatus and total length of hospital stay in patients undergoing reversal of ileostomy were compared using t-test.

resultsMean age of the patients in Group A was 26.12 (± 7.1) years and in Group B was 28.80 (± 10.5) years. There were 25 males (50%) and 25 females (50%) in Group A. In Group B, there were 29 males (58%) and 21 females (42%). Mean BMI in Group A was 23.5 (± 5.3), and in Group B was 21.4 (± 4.6). The mean time to pass flatus was noted to be significantly shorter, 18.36 (± 8.43) hours, in the chewing group (Group A), whereas in the no chewing gum group (Group B), it was 41.16 (± 6.14) hours (p value < 0.001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter 84 (± 8.3) hours in the chewing gum group (Group A) as compared to 107.04 (± 6.4) hours in the no chewing gum group (Group B) (p value 0.000).

conclusionIt is concluded that postoperative chewing of gum after the reversal of ileostomy is accompanied with a significantly shorter time to passage of flatus and shorter length of hospital stay.

Indexed as

Chewing GumIleusAdultFemaleGastrointestinal MotilityHumansIleostomyLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsYoung AdultChewing Gum

Identifiers

PMID33403448
OpenAlexW3118644359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.