ReviewEndoscopy international open2021
Efficacy of Endocuff Vision compared to first-generation Endocuff in adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate in high-definition colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05141773 (Computer-assisted Adenoma Detection Coloscopy With Endo-AID Artificial Intelligence System and Endocuff Versus Endocuff Assisted Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Computer-assisted Adenoma Detection Coloscopy With Endo-AID Artificial Intelligence System and Endocuff Versus Endocuff Assisted Colonoscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: a GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Effect of a distal attachment cuff on adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: Randomized controlled trial in the Spanish population.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- History of colonoscopy and technological advances: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.