ReviewCureus2020
Alzheimer's Gone Viral: Could Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Be Stealing Your Memories?
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 With Dementia Outcomes: Longitudinal Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-World Electronic Health Record Data.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Increased risk of dementia associated with herpes simplex virus infections: Evidence from a retrospective cohort study using U.S. electronic health records.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Association of Genetic Polymorphisms in Long Noncoding RNA HOTTIP with Risk of Idiopathic Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion.Biochemical genetics · 2024Review
- A review of the roles of pathogens in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- SARS-CoV-2 amyloid, is COVID-19-exacerbated dementia an amyloid disorder in the making?Frontiers in dementia · 2023Article
- New Insights into the Molecular Interplay between Human Herpesviruses and Alzheimer's Disease-A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the principal causes of disability and morbidity. It is one of the most expensive illnesses. Despite this, there are no significant data regarding its etiology and optimal treatment. This review concentrates on the viral hypothesis of AD. After a comprehensive PubMed literature search, we analyzed the studies associating herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV1) infection to AD from the previous 10 years. Molecular mechanisms whereby HSV1 induces AD-related pathophysiology, including neuronal production and accumulation of amyloid-beta (amyloid-β), abnormal phosphorylation of tau proteins, impaired calcium homeostasis, and autophagy, are addressed. The virus also imitates the disease in other ways, showing increased neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal apoptosis. Serological studies correlate HSV1 infection with AD and cognitive impairment. A causal link between HSV1 and AD raises the concept of a simple, efficient, and preventive treatment alternative. Anti-viral agents impede brain degeneration by preventing HSV1 spread and its replication, decreasing hyperphosphorylated tau and amyloid-β; thus providing an efficacious treatment for AD. We also mention brown algae, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and a synthetic drug, BAY57-1293, with anti-viral properties, as options for treating AD. We want to recommend future researchers to look for more affordable, non-invasive, and swifter techniques to identify HSV1 in the brain and assist in the early detection and prevention of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.