ArticleSAGE open medicine2020
Immediate effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on swallowing function in individuals after oral and oropharyngeal cancer therapy.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of dysphagia - an update.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Plant Bioactive Constituents and Their Potential Benefits in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Narrative Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Immediate Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing in Elderly People with Alzheimer's Dementia.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2025Article
- Sensory neuromuscular electrical stimulation for dysphagia rehabilitation: A literature review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the immediate effect of sensory and motor neuromuscular electrical stimulation, in oral and pharyngeal stages of swallowing, in individuals after oral and oropharyngeal cancer therapy.
methodsThe study was conducted on 10 individuals (mean age of 58 years) submitted to oral and oropharyngeal cancer therapy. The individuals were submitted to videofluoroscopy, during which they were randomly asked to swallow 5 mL of liquid, honey, and pudding, in three conditions: without stimulation, with sensory neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and with motor neuromuscular electrical stimulation. The degree of swallowing dysfunction was scored (Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale), as well as the presence of food stasis (Eisenhuber scale), and measurement of the oral and pharyngeal transit time. The results were statistically analyzed by the Friedman test or analysis of variance for repeated measures.
resultsThe Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale revealed improvement for one individual with both sensory and motor stimuli, and worsening in two individuals, being one with motor and one with sensory stimulus. In the Eisenhuber scale, the neuromuscular electrical stimulation changed the presence of residues to variable extents. Concerning the oral and pharyngeal transit time, no difference was observed between the different stimulation levels for the consistencies tested (p > 0.05).
conclusionBoth sensory and motor neuromuscular electrical stimulations presented a varied immediate impact on the oral and pharyngeal stages of swallowing in individuals after oral and oropharyngeal cancer therapy. Thus, the results of the immediate effect suggest that the technique is not indicated, evidencing the need of caution in the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the rehabilitation of dysphagia, after HNC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.