Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403107›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2020

Setting global research priorities for private sector child health service delivery: Results from a CHNRI exercise.

Catherine Clarence, Tess Shiras, Jack Zhu, Malia K Boggs, Nefra Faltas, Anna Wadsworth, Sarah Ek Bradley, Salim Sadruddin, Kerri Wazny, Catherine Goodman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Catherine ClarenceAbt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Tess ShirasAbt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jack ZhuDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Malia K BoggsUnited States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition, Washington, D.C., USA.
Nefra FaltasUnited States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition, Washington, D.C., USA.
Anna WadsworthAbt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Sarah Ek BradleyAbt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Salim SadruddinSave the Children, Washington, D.C., USA.
Kerri WaznyJohns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Catherine GoodmanDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Phyllis AworMakerere University College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, Makerere, Uganda.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Karin KällanderImplementation Research & Delivery Science Unit, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abt Global (United States) · USBoston University · USUnited States Agency for International Development · USHospital for Sick Children · CAJohns Hopkins University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMakerere University · UGSave the Children · USUnited Nations Children's Fund · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe private health sector is an important source of sick child care, yet evidence gaps persist in best practices for integrated management of private sector child health services. Further, there is no prioritized research agenda to address these gaps. We used a Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) process to identify priority research questions in response to these evidence gaps. CHNRI is a consultative approach that entails prioritizing research questions by evaluating them against standardized criteria.

methodsWe engaged geographically and occupationally diverse experts in the private health sector and child health. Eighty-nine experts agreed to participate and provided 150 priority research questions. We consolidated submitted questions to reduce duplication into a final list of 50. We asked participants to complete an online survey to rank each question against 11 pre-determined criteria in four categories: (i) answerability, (ii) research feasibility, (iii) sustainability/equity, and (iv) importance/potential impact. Statistical data analysis was conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary NC, USA). We weighted all 11 evaluation criteria equally to calculate the research priority score and average expert agreement for each question. We disaggregated results by location in high-income vs low- and middle-income countries.

resultsForty-nine participants (55.1%) completed the online survey, including 33 high-income and 16 low- and middle-income country respondents. The top, prioritized research question asks whether accreditation or regulation of private clinical and non-clinical sources of care would improve integrated management of childhood illness services. Four of the top ten research priorities were related to adherence to case management protocols. Other top research priorities were related to training and supportive supervision, digital health, and infant and newborn care. Research priorities among high-income and low- and middle-income country respondents were highly correlated.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first systematic exercise conducted to define research priorities for the management of childhood illness in the private sector. The research priorities put forth in this CHNRI exercise aim to stimulate interest from policy makers, program managers, researchers, and donors to respond to and help close evidence gaps hindering the acceleration of reductions in child mortality through private sector approaches.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchChild Health ServicesHealth PrioritiesPrivate SectorChildChild HealthHumansIncomeInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID33403107
PMCPMC7750021
OpenAlexW3116765734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.