Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402905›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2020

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of

Temidayo O Elufisan, Isabel Cristina Rodriguez Luna, Omotayo O Oyedara, Alejandro Sanchez Varela, Virgilio Bocanegra García, Busayo O Oluyide, Samantha Flores Treviño, Miguel Angel Villalobos López, Xianwu Guo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distribution and Antibiotic Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Versatility ofHeliyon · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The decolorization and degradation of azo dyes by two Stenotrophomonas strains isolated from textile effluent (Tepetitla, Mexico).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Temidayo O ElufisanInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Reynosa, Tamaulipas 88710, México.
Isabel Cristina Rodriguez LunaInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Reynosa, Tamaulipas 88710, México.
Omotayo O OyedaraDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Basic and Applied Science, Osun State University, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.
Alejandro Sanchez VarelaInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Reynosa, Tamaulipas 88710, México.
Virgilio Bocanegra GarcíaInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Reynosa, Tamaulipas 88710, México.
Busayo O OluyideEkiti State College of Science and Health Technology, Ijero Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
Samantha Flores TreviñoDepartamento de Medicina, Autonomous University of Nuevo León (UANL), Interna San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico.
Miguel Angel Villalobos LópezInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología Aplicada, Tepetitla, Tlaxcala 90700, México.
Xianwu GuoInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Reynosa, Tamaulipas 88710, México.
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXEkiti State University · NGObafemi Awolowo University · NGOsun State University · NGUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

objectiveWe isolated 45 METHODOLOGY: The identities of isolates were confirmed with 16S rRNA gene sequence and MALDI-TOF analysis. Anti-microbial resistance, biofilm production and clonal diversity were also evaluated. The minimum inhibitory concentration technique as described by Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute: CLSI Guidelines (CLSI) was employed for the evaluation of isolate susceptibility to antibiotics.

resultForty-five

conclusionEnvironmental isolates from this study were resistant to SXT which is commonly used for the treatment of

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMass SpectrometryMexicoMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASewageSoil MicrobiologyStenotrophomonasTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combinationanti-microbial susceptibilitybiochemical characterizationclonal diversityenvironmentalStenotrophomonas

Identifiers

PMID33402905
PMCPMC7750080
OpenAlexW3022784691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.