Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402491›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Prognostic Factors After Surgical Treatment of Liver Metastases from Breast Cancer - 19 Years of Experience.

KristÝna ProchÁzkovÁ, KristÝna PivovarČÍkovÁ, Milena RouŠarovÁ, Josef VodiČka, Petr HoŠek, Inka TŘeŠkovÁ, OndŘej Hes, Radek KuČera, OndŘej TopolČan, Vladislav TŘeŠka

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hormone receptor conversion in metastatic breast cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

KristÝna ProchÁzkovÁDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
KristÝna PivovarČÍkovÁDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Milena RouŠarovÁCzech National Oncological Register, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Josef VodiČkaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Petr HoŠekBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Inka TŘeŠkovÁDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
OndŘej HesDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Radek KuČeraDepartment of Immunochemistry Diagnostics Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic kucerar@fnplzen.cz.
OndŘej TopolČanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Vladislav TŘeŠkaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe aim of this study was to determine the importance of surgical treatment, utility of hormone receptor status and selected biomarkers in the prognosis of patients with liver metastases from breast cancer (BCLM). PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty female underwent surgery for BCLM between 1/2000 and 1/2019.

resultsThe type of surgery (resection/radiofrequency ablation) had no impact on overall survival (OS) - (p=0.894). Having more than one BCLM (p=0.003), expression of human epidermal receptor 2 in metastases (p=0.034), as well as an elevated presurgical level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p=0.017) and postsurgical thymidine kinase (p=0.034) were negative prognostics factor for recurrence-free survival. The factors affecting OS included the number of liver procedures (p=0.021), the degree of proliferative activity (p=0.008) and elevated postsurgical carcinoembryonic antigen level (p=0.038).

conclusionThe type of surgery had no impact on OS. Markers and hormonal status of liver metastases are important factors affecting prognosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenFemaleHepatectomyHumansPrognosisCA-19-9 AntigenbiomarkersBreast cancerhormone receptor statusliver metastasesliver resectionprognostic markers

Identifiers

PMID33402491
PMCPMC7880733
OpenAlexW3119942795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.