ArticleJournal of intensive care2021
The effects of a limited infusion rate of fluid in the early resuscitation of sepsis on glycocalyx shedding measured by plasma syndecan-1: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resuscitation-associated endotheliopathy (RAsE): a conceptual framework based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The Effects of Conservative Fluid Management and Active Deresuscitation on Markers of Tissue Perfusion, Kidney Injury, and Vascular Injury in Critically Ill Adults: A Secondary Analysis of the Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) Trial.Critical care explorations · 2026Trial
- Fluid bolus increases plasma hyaluronan concentration compared to follow-up strategy without a bolus in oliguric intensive care unit patients.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Speed of intravenous fluid on glycocalyx integrity and central blood volume in a porcine septic shock model.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Vascular permeability and loss of glycocalix in sepsis: the role of fluid resuscitation.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Endothelial glycocalyx degradation and its association with clinical outcomes and host response aberrations in community-acquired pneumonia across different care settings.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Endothelial glycocalyx injury in bacterial bloodstream infection: biological determinants and association with host response aberrations.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Angiopoietin-2 Surpasses Soluble Thrombomodulin and Syndecan-1 in Characterizing Septic Shock and Predicting Mortality--A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Review
- Serum hyaluronic acid in critically ill dogs and influence of intravenous fluid therapy.PloS one · 2025Article
- GSDMD-NETs in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy and their interaction with glycocalyx damage.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Association between intravenous fluid administration and endothelial glycocalyx shedding in humans: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Review
- Global trends in research on endothelial cells and sepsis between 2002 and 2022: A systematic bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Precision fluid and vasoactive drug therapy for critically ill patients.Pharmacotherapy · 2023Review
- Effect of intravenous fluid volume on biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx shedding and inflammation during initial resuscitation of sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Article
- Endothelial Damage and the Microcirculation in Critical Illness.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- No association between intravenous fluid volume and endothelial glycocalyx shedding in patients undergoing resuscitation for sepsis in the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Endothelial glycocalyx degradation during sepsis: Causes and consequences.Matrix biology plus · 2021Article
- Investigation of Wall Shear Stress in Cardiovascular Research and in Clinical Practice-From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Urinary syndecan-1 in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane: A randomized, prospective study.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAggressive fluid administration is recommended in the resuscitation of septic patients. However, the delivery of a rapid fluid bolus might cause harm by inducing degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx. This research aimed to examine the effects of the limited infusion rate of fluid on glycocalyx shedding as measured by syndecan-1 in patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion.
methodsA prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted between November 2018 and February 2020 in an urban academic emergency department. Patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion, defined as hypotension or hyperlactatemia, were randomized to receive either the standard rate (30 ml/kg/h) or limited rate (10 ml/kg/h) of fluid for the first 30 ml/kg fluid resuscitation. Subsequently, the fluid rate was adjusted according to the physician's discretion but not more than that of the designated fluid rate for the total of 6 h. The primary outcome was differences in change of syndecan-1 levels at 6 h compared to baseline between standard and limited rate groups. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, organ failure, and 90-day mortality.
resultsWe included 96 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 48 assigned to the standard-rate strategy and 48 to the limited-rate strategy. The median fluid volume in 6 h in the limited-rate group was 39 ml/kg (interquartile range [IQR] 35-52 ml/kg) vs. 53 ml/kg (IQR 46-64 ml/kg) in the standard-rate group (p < 0.001). Patients in the limited-rate group were less likely to received vasopressors (17% vs 42%; p = 0.007) and mechanical ventilation (20% vs 41%; p = 0.049) during the first 6 h. There were no significantly different changes in syndecan-1 levels at 6 h between the two groups (geometric mean ratio [GMR] in the limited-rate group, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.02; p = 0.07). There were no significant differences in adverse events, organ failure outcomes, or mortality between the two groups.
conclusionsIn sepsis resuscitation, the limited rate of fluid resuscitation compared to the standard rate did not significantly reduce changes in syndecan-1 at 6 h.
trial registrationThai Clinical Trials Registry number: TCTR20181010001. Registered 8 October 2018, http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&smenu=fulltext&task=search&task2=view1&id=4064.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.