Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402124›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

CA724 predicts overall survival in locally advanced gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Yilin Tong, Yan Zhao, Zexing Shan, Jianjun Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yilin TongDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No 44 of Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Liaoning, 110042, Shenyang, China.
Yan ZhaoDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No 44 of Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Liaoning, 110042, Shenyang, China.
Zexing ShanDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No 44 of Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Liaoning, 110042, Shenyang, China.
Jianjun ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No 44 of Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Liaoning, 110042, Shenyang, China. zhangjianjun@cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-2469
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum tumor markers including AFU, AFP, CEA, CA199, CA125 and CA724, are of great importance in the diagnosis, prognostic prediction and recurrence monitoring of gastrointestinal malignancies. However, their significance in gastric cancer (GC) patients with neoadjuvant therapy (NCT) is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of these six tumor markers in locally advanced GC patients who underwent NCT and curative surgery.

methodsIn total, 290 locally advanced GC patients who underwent NCT and D2 radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Data on their tumor markers before (pre-) and after (post-) NCT and pathological characteristics were extracted from the database of our hospital. The optimal cutoff values of the six tumor markers were calculated by the ROC curve and Youden index. Their predictive significance was analyzed and survival curves for overall survival (OS) were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between categorical variables were explored by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analyses were performed by the Cox regression model.

resultsPre- and post-CA199, -CA125 and -CA724 could predict overall survival (all P < 0.05), but only the change (diff-) of CA199 was related to prognosis (P = 0.05). In the multivariable analysis, pre- (P = 0.014) and post-CA724 (P = 0.036) remained significant, though diff-CA724 was not an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.581). In addition, pre- and post-CA199, -CA125 and -CA724 were associated with lymph node metastasis (N- vs N+) and pathological stage (I-II vs III) (all P < 0.05). Moreover, post-CA724 was related to the vascular or lymphatic invasion (P = 0.019), while pre-CA724 was not (P = 0.082). However, AFU, AFP and CEA showed no association with survival (P > 0.05).

conclusionsCA724 is an independent factor for prognosis and could be used to predict ypN and ypTNM stage in locally advanced GC patients undergoing NCT and curative resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorCA-72-4 antigenCA125CA199CA724Gastric cancerNeoadjuvant therapyTumor marker

Identifiers

PMID33402124
PMCPMC7786973
OpenAlexW3105432269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.