Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402112›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Comparison of adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario.

Na Zeng, Erica Erwin, Wendy Wen, Daniel J Corsi, Shi Wu Wen, Yanfang Guo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Voting Restrictions and Increased Odds of Adverse Birth Outcomes in the US.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploring patients' perspectives of gestational diabetes mellitus screening and counselling in Ontario: A grounded theory study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na ZengSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Erica ErwinOMNI Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Wendy WenOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel J CorsiSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shi Wu WenSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Yanfang GuoSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. yguo@bornontario.ca.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) FDN-148438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes have been studied in other countries, but little has been done for the Canadian population. In this study, we sought to examine the disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians in Ontario, Canada.

methodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study that included all Asian and Caucasian women who attended a prenatal screening and resulted in a singleton birth in an Ontario hospital (April 1st, 2015-March 31st, 2017). Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the independent adjusted relative risks and adjusted risk difference of adverse perinatal outcomes for Asians compared with Caucasians.

resultsAmong 237,293 eligible women, 31% were Asian and 69% were Caucasian. Asians were at an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, placental previa, early preterm birth (< 32 weeks), preterm birth, emergency cesarean section, 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears, low birth weight (< 2500 g, < 1500 g), small-for-gestational-age (<10

conclusionThere are significant differences in several adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians. These differences should be taken into consideration for clinical practices due to the large Asian population in Canada.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultCesarean SectionDiabetes, GestationalEmergenciesFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMiddle AgedOntario

Identifiers

PMID33402112
PMCPMC7786932
OpenAlexW3121017819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.