Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402106›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2021

Methodological flaws on "manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review" by Prevost et al. (2019).

Hainan Yu, Heather Shearer, Anne Taylor-Vaisey, Silvano Mior, Leslie Verville, Gaelan Connell, Pierre Côté

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hainan YuCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Heather ShearerCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Anne Taylor-VaiseyCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Silvano MiorCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Leslie VervilleCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Gaelan ConnellCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Pierre CôtéCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada. pierre.cote@ontariotechu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-6676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevost et al. published a systematic review evaluating the use of manual therapy for clinical conditions in the pediatric population in 2019. However, several methodological flaws in the conduct of the review limit the internal validity of its conclusions. We caution readers about the validity of the recommendations and suggest that the review not be used to inform the clinical management of pediatric patients.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsChildHumansManipulationManual therapyMobilizationPediatricSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33402106
PMCPMC7786940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.