Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402095›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

Microbiology of secondary infections in Buruli ulcer lesions; implications for therapeutic interventions.

Elizabeth Gyamfi, Charles A Narh, Charles Quaye, Adiza Abbass, Bartholomew Dzudzor, Lydia Mosi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacterial diversity in Buruli ulcer lesions in Ghana.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Clinical and microbiological predictors of healing in Buruli ulcer disease.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Variable Number Tandem Repeat Profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elizabeth GyamfiDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Charles A NarhNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Charles QuayeNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Adiza AbbassDepartment of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Bartholomew DzudzorDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Lydia MosiDepartment of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana. lmosi@ug.edu.gh.ORCID 0000-0002-7672-0181
University of Ghana · GH

Funding

University of Ghana URF/6/ILG-008/2012-2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuruli ulcer (BU) is a skin disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans and is the second most common mycobacterial disease after tuberculosis in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire. M. ulcerans produces mycolactone, an immunosuppressant macrolide toxin, responsible for the characteristic painless nature of the infection. Secondary infection of ulcers before, during and after treatment has been associated with delayed wound healing and resistance to streptomycin and rifampicin. However, not much is known of the bacteria causing these infections as well as antimicrobial drugs for treating the secondary microorganism. This study sought to identify secondary microbial infections in BU lesions and to determine their levels of antibiotic resistance due to the prolonged antibiotic therapy required for Buruli ulcer.

resultsSwabs from fifty-one suspected BU cases were sampled in the Amansie Central District from St. Peters Hospital (Jacobu) and through an active case surveillance. Forty of the samples were M. ulcerans (BU) positive. Secondary bacteria were identified in all sampled lesions (N = 51). The predominant bacteria identified in both BU and Non-BU groups were Staphylococci spp and Bacilli spp. The most diverse secondary bacteria were detected among BU patients who were not yet on antibiotic treatment. Fungal species identified were Candida spp, Penicillium spp and Trichodema spp. Selected secondary bacteria isolates were all susceptible to clarithromycin and amikacin among both BU and Non-BU patients. Majority, however, had high resistance to streptomycin.

conclusionsMicroorganisms other than M. ulcerans colonize and proliferate on BU lesions. Secondary microorganisms of BU wounds were mainly Staphylococcus spp, Bacillus spp and Pseudomonas spp. These secondary microorganisms were less predominant in BU patients under treatment compared to those without treatment. The delay in healing that are experienced by some BU patients could be as a result of these bacteria and fungi colonizing and proliferating in BU lesions. Clarithromycin and amikacin are likely suitable drugs for clearance of secondary infection of Buruli ulcer.

Indexed as

AdultAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillusBacteriaBuruli UlcerCandidaClarithromycinCoinfectionCote d'IvoireCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFungiGhanaHumansMaleAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinStreptomycinAntibioticsAntimicrobial resistanceBuruli ulcerMycobacterium ulceransSecondary Infection

Identifiers

PMID33402095
PMCPMC7783985
OpenAlexW3120986917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.