ArticleBMC microbiology2021
Microbiology of secondary infections in Buruli ulcer lesions; implications for therapeutic interventions.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological, Environmental, and Social Determinants of Buruli Ulcer in Africa: Their Interplay Across Disease Severity and Patient Outcome.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Improved protocols for isolation of Mycobacterium ulcerans from clinical samples.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Establishment of LC-MS/MS Methodology for the Determination of Rapamycin Concentration in Rat Whole Blood.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Buruli ulcer community health education and medical screening in Ga South District, Ghana.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Experimental infection of ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) with Mycobacterium ulcerans, the agent of Buruli ulcer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Volatile organic compound detection of Buruli ulcer disease: Headspace analysis of Mycobacterium ulcerans and used gauzes of Buruli-compatible ulcers.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Bacterial diversity in Buruli ulcer lesions in Ghana.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024Article
- Clinical and microbiological predictors of healing in Buruli ulcer disease.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in the Management Strategies for Buruli Ulcers.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Variable Number Tandem Repeat Profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBuruli ulcer (BU) is a skin disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans and is the second most common mycobacterial disease after tuberculosis in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire. M. ulcerans produces mycolactone, an immunosuppressant macrolide toxin, responsible for the characteristic painless nature of the infection. Secondary infection of ulcers before, during and after treatment has been associated with delayed wound healing and resistance to streptomycin and rifampicin. However, not much is known of the bacteria causing these infections as well as antimicrobial drugs for treating the secondary microorganism. This study sought to identify secondary microbial infections in BU lesions and to determine their levels of antibiotic resistance due to the prolonged antibiotic therapy required for Buruli ulcer.
resultsSwabs from fifty-one suspected BU cases were sampled in the Amansie Central District from St. Peters Hospital (Jacobu) and through an active case surveillance. Forty of the samples were M. ulcerans (BU) positive. Secondary bacteria were identified in all sampled lesions (N = 51). The predominant bacteria identified in both BU and Non-BU groups were Staphylococci spp and Bacilli spp. The most diverse secondary bacteria were detected among BU patients who were not yet on antibiotic treatment. Fungal species identified were Candida spp, Penicillium spp and Trichodema spp. Selected secondary bacteria isolates were all susceptible to clarithromycin and amikacin among both BU and Non-BU patients. Majority, however, had high resistance to streptomycin.
conclusionsMicroorganisms other than M. ulcerans colonize and proliferate on BU lesions. Secondary microorganisms of BU wounds were mainly Staphylococcus spp, Bacillus spp and Pseudomonas spp. These secondary microorganisms were less predominant in BU patients under treatment compared to those without treatment. The delay in healing that are experienced by some BU patients could be as a result of these bacteria and fungi colonizing and proliferating in BU lesions. Clarithromycin and amikacin are likely suitable drugs for clearance of secondary infection of Buruli ulcer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.