Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33402069›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

A triple threat: high population density, high foraging intensity and flexible habitat preferences explain high impact of feral cats on prey.

Rowena P Hamer, Riana Z Gardiner, Kirstin M Proft, Christopher N Johnson, Menna E Jones

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Friends because of foes: synchronous movement within predator-prey domains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rowena P HamerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia.
Riana Z GardinerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia.
Kirstin M ProftSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia.
Christopher N JohnsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia.
Menna E JonesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alien mammalian carnivores have contributed disproportionately to global loss of biodiversity. In Australia, predation by the feral cat and red fox is one of the most significant causes of the decline of native vertebrates. To discover why cats have greater impacts on prey than native predators, we compared the ecology of the feral cat to a marsupial counterpart, the spotted-tailed quoll. Individual prey are 20-200 times more likely to encounter feral cats, because of the combined effects of cats' higher population densities, greater intensity of home-range use and broader habitat preferences. These characteristics also mean that the costs to the prey of adopting anti-predator behaviours against feral cats are likely to be much higher than adopting such behaviours in response to spotted-tailed quolls, due to the reliability and ubiquity of feral cat cues. These results help explain the devastating impacts of cats on wildlife in Australia and other parts of the world.

Indexed as

Animals, WildEcosystemAnimalsAustraliaCatsPopulation DensityPredatory BehaviorReproducibility of Resultsalien carnivoreferal catpredator–prey interactionprey naiveterelative predation impactspotted-tailed quoll

Identifiers

PMID33402069
PMCPMC7892407
OpenAlexW3119522363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.