Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33401855›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2020

Early Management of Spinal Cord Injury: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

José Antonio Soriano Sánchez, Salman Sharif, Francesco Costa, Jose Alberto Israel Romero Rangel, Carla Daniela Anania, Mehmet Zileli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perioperative management in acute and chronic spinal cord injury, narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Management of traumatic spinal cord injury in the Nordic countries: a multidisciplinary survey.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic MRI parameters in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Antonio Soriano SánchezSpine Clinic of the Neurological Center, American British-Cowdray Medical Center IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Salman SharifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Francesco CostaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
Jose Alberto Israel Romero RangelAmerican British-Cowdray Medical Center IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carla Daniela AnaniaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
Mehmet ZileliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific knowledge today is being generated more rapidly than we can assimilate thus requiring continuous review of gold-standards for diagnosis and treatment of specific pathologies. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on the best early management of spinal cord injury (SCI), in order to produce acceptable worldwide recommendations to standardize clinical practice as much as possible.The WFNS Spine Committee voted recommendations regarding management of SCI based on literature review of the last 10 years. The committee stated 9 recommendations on 3 main topics: (1) clinical assessment and classification of SCI; (2) emergency care and early management; (3) cardiopulmonary management. American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, Spinal Cord Independence Measure, and International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Pain Data Set are considered the most useful and feasible in emergency evaluation and follow-up in case of SCI. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most indicated examination to evaluate patients with symptomatic SCI. In early phase, correction of hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg), and bradycardia are strongly recommended. Surgical decompression should be performed as soon as possible with the ideal surgical time being within 8 hours for both complete and incomplete lesions.

Indexed as

AssessmentCardiopulmonary managementEmergency careGuidelinesSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID33401855
PMCPMC7788427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.