ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
PIC-GAN: A Parallel Imaging Coupled Generative Adversarial Network for Accelerated Multi-Channel MRI Reconstruction.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights on Scan-Specific Deep-Learning Strategies for Brain MRI Parallel Imaging Reconstruction.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of different acceleration factors of artificial intelligence-compressed sensing for brachial plexus MRI imaging: scanning time and image quality.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Considerations on Image Preprocessing Techniques Required by Deep Learning Models. The Case of the Knee MRIs.Maedica · 2024Article
- Self-Supervised Deep Unrolled Reconstruction Using Regularization by Denoising.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- AI-assisted compressed sensing and parallel imaging sequences for MRI of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of their capabilities in terms of examination time and image quality.European radiology · 2023Article
- [Application of generative adversarial network in magnetic resonance image reconstruction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023Review
- Multi-channel GAN-based calibration-free diffusion-weighted liver imaging with simultaneous coil sensitivity estimation and reconstruction.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Stabilizing deep tomographic reconstruction: Part A. Hybrid framework and experimental results.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- A review and experimental evaluation of deep learning methods for MRI reconstruction.The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging · 2022Article
- Edge-enhanced dual discriminator generative adversarial network for fast MRI with parallel imaging using multi-view information.Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- CryoETGAN: Cryo-Electron Tomography Image SynthesisFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- MAGnitude-Image-to-ComplexDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we proposed a model combing parallel imaging (PI) with generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture (PIC-GAN) for accelerated multi-channel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction. This model integrated data fidelity and regularization terms into the generator to benefit from multi-coils information and provide an "end-to-end" reconstruction. Besides, to better preserve image details during reconstruction, we combined the adversarial loss with pixel-wise loss in both image and frequency domains. The proposed PIC-GAN framework was evaluated on abdominal and knee MRI images using 2, 4 and 6-fold accelerations with different undersampling patterns. The performance of the PIC-GAN was compared to the sparsity-based parallel imaging (L1-ESPIRiT), the variational network (VN), and conventional GAN with single-channel images as input (zero-filled (ZF)-GAN). Experimental results show that our PIC-GAN can effectively reconstruct multi-channel MR images at a low noise level and improved structure similarity of the reconstructed images. PIC-GAN has yielded the lowest Normalized Mean Square Error (in ×10-5) (PIC-GAN: 0.58 ± 0.37, ZF-GAN: 1.93 ± 1.41, VN: 1.87 ± 1.28, L1-ESPIRiT: 2.49 ± 1.04 for abdominal MRI data and PIC-GAN: 0.80 ± 0.26, ZF-GAN: 0.93 ± 0.29, VN:1.18 ± 0.31, L1-ESPIRiT: 1.28 ± 0.24 for knee MRI data) and the highest Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PIC-GAN: 34.43 ± 1.92, ZF-GAN: 31.45 ± 4.0, VN: 29.26 ± 2.98, L1-ESPIRiT: 25.40 ± 1.88 for abdominal MRI data and PIC-GAN: 34.10 ± 1.09, ZF-GAN: 31.47 ± 1.05, VN: 30.01 ± 1.01, L1-ESPIRiT: 28.01 ± 0.98 for knee MRI data) compared to ZF-GAN, VN and L1-ESPIRiT with an under-sampling factor of 6. The proposed PIC-GAN framework has shown superior reconstruction performance in terms of reducing aliasing artifacts and restoring tissue structures as compared to other conventional and state-of-the-art reconstruction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.