Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33401609›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effects of In Vitro Interactions of Oviduct Epithelial Cells with Frozen-Thawed Stallion Spermatozoa on Their Motility, Viability and Capacitation Status.

Brenda Florencia Gimeno, María Victoria Bariani, Lucía Laiz-Quiroga, Eduardo Martínez-León, Micaela Von-Meyeren, Osvaldo Rey, Adrián Ángel Mutto, Claudia Elena Osycka-Salut

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From reservoir to rendezvous: the journey of sperm through the oviduct.Reproduction, fertility, and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda Florencia GimenoLaboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
María Victoria BarianiLaboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Lucía Laiz-QuirogaLaboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Eduardo Martínez-LeónSignaling and Cancer Laboratory, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), CP 1120, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6099-2182
Micaela Von-MeyerenLaboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Osvaldo ReySignaling and Cancer Laboratory, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), CP 1120, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-9864
Adrián Ángel MuttoLaboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Claudia Elena Osycka-SalutLaboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-5155
National University of General San Martín · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2015-1548Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2016-3138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation by negatively affecting sperm quality decreases the efficiency of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs). Thus, we first evaluated sperm motility at different conditions for the manipulation of equine cryopreserved spermatozoa. Higher motility was observed when spermatozoa were incubated for 30 min at 30 × 10

Indexed as

ARTscryopreserved spermequinessperm–oviduct interactionsperm selection

Identifiers

PMID33401609
PMCPMC7823615
OpenAlexW3120664609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.