Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33401584›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Gait Analysis under Spatial Navigation Task in Elderly People-A Pilot Study.

Natalia Pawlaczyk, Magdalena Szmytke, Michał Meina, Monika Lewandowska, Justyna Stępniak, Bibianna Bałaj, Joanna Dreszer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Navigating space and the developing mind.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalia PawlaczykFaculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Podmurna 74, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-5790
Magdalena SzmytkeFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4714-0601
Michał MeinaDepartment of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Grudziądzka 5, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1652-6122
Monika LewandowskaFaculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Podmurna 74, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Justyna StępniakCentre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Wileńska 4, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Bibianna BałajFaculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Podmurna 74, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-7493
Joanna DreszerFaculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Podmurna 74, 87-100 Torun, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decline in the Spatial Navigation (SN) abilities has been observed in the course of healthy aging. Walking is an inseparable part of the navigation process; however, research tasks overlook this aspect in studies involving seniors. The present study was designed to overcome this limitation by recording gait parameters during natural environment navigation and to determine gait indicators that most accurately assign the participants to the proper age category. Thirteen elderly (mean age = 69.1 ± 5.4 year) and sixteen young women (mean age = 21.5 ± 2.2 year) equipped with gait sensors were asked to learn a path while walking in a real building (Learning Phase), reproduce the path (Memory Phase) and reach targets after a 30 min delay (Delayed Phase). The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that our self-developed Gait Style Change indicator, that is, the difference in the probability of feet landing between particular SN task phases, classified the participants into either the elderly or the young group with the highest accuracy (0.91). The second most important indicator, the Task-Related (step counts in each SN task phase), achieved the accuracy discrimination of 0.83. The gait indicators, comprising single gait parameters measured while navigating, might be considered as accurately differentiating older from younger people.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationAgedCognitionFemaleGaitGait AnalysisHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsWalkingYoung Adultagingdual-taskgaitspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID33401584
PMCPMC7796419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.