ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-sensor monitoring of a transient event in the Gran Sasso aquifer, Italy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Review of Rotational Seismology Area of Interest from a Recording and Rotational Sensors Point of View.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Seismic Beacon-A New Instrument for Detection of Changes in Rock Massif.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of Three-Axis Fibre-Optic Seismograph for Direct and Autonomous Monitoring of Rotational Events with Perspective of Historical Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Post-Processing of Raw Data Recorded Continuously Using a FORS-Fibre-Optic Rotational Seismograph.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Equations of Disturbed Motion of the Moving Part of the Gyroscope Suspension.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Rotation Rate Sensors and Their Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Study of Rotational Motions Caused by Multiple Mining Blasts Recorded by Different Types of Rotational Seismometers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Performance Test of the Rotational Sensor blueSeis-3A in a Huddle Test in Fürstenfeldbruck.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Rotaphone-CY: The Newest Rotaphone Model Design and Preliminary Results from Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in measuring displacement gradients, such as rotation and strain, is growing in many areas of geophysical research. This results in an urgent demand for reliable and field-deployable instruments measuring these quantities. In order to further establish a high-quality standard for rotation and strain measurements in seismology, we organized a comparative sensor test experiment that took place in November 2019 at the Geophysical Observatory of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich in Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany. More than 24 different sensors, including three-component and single-component broadband rotational seismometers, six-component strong-motion sensors and Rotaphone systems, as well as the large ring laser gyroscopes ROMY and a Distributed Acoustic Sensing system, were involved in addition to 14 classical broadband seismometers and a 160 channel, 4.5 Hz geophone chain. The experiment consisted of two parts: during the first part, the sensors were co-located in a huddle test recording self-noise and signals from small, nearby explosions. In a second part, the sensors were distributed into the field in various array configurations recording seismic signals that were generated by small amounts of explosive and a Vibroseis truck. This paper presents details on the experimental setup and a first sensor performance comparison focusing on sensor self-noise, signal-to-noise ratios, and waveform similarities for the rotation rate sensors. Most of the sensors show a high level of coherency and waveform similarity within a narrow frequency range between 10 Hz and 20 Hz for recordings from a nearby explosion signal. Sensor as well as experiment design are critically accessed revealing the great need for reliable reference sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.