Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33401475›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Performance Evaluation of Porous Graphene as Filter Media for the Removal of Pharmaceutical/Emerging Contaminants from Water and Wastewater.

Ahmed M E Khalil, Fayyaz A Memon, Tanveer A Tabish, Ben Fenton, Deborah Salmon, Shaowei Zhang, David Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed M E KhalilCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-9847
Fayyaz A MemonCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK.
Tanveer A TabishCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-056X
Ben FentonCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8413-7957
Deborah SalmonCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QD, UK.
Shaowei ZhangCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK.
David ButlerCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5515-3416

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Government of India DST/TM/INDO-UK/2K17/66(C)UK Natural Environment Research Council NE/R003548/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene and its counterparts have been widely used for the removal of contaminants from (waste)water but with limited success for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants. Driven by this need, this study reports, for the first time, the removal of pharmaceuticals from real contaminated water samples using porous graphene (PG) as a filter-based column. This work systematically evaluates the performance of PG as a filter medium for the removal of widely consumed pharmaceutical/emerging contaminants (ECs) such as atenolol, carbamazepine, ciprofloxacin, diclofenac, gemfibrozil and ibuprofen. Several factors were investigated in these column studies, including different reactive layer configurations, bed packing heights (5-45 mm), filter sizes (inner diameter 18-40 mm), adsorbent dosages (100-500 mg-PG) and water bodies (distilled water, greywater, and actual effluent wastewater). Sustainable synthesis of PG was carried out followed by its use as a filter medium for the removal of pharmaceuticals at high concentrations (10.5 ± 0.5 mg/L) and trace concentrations (1 mg/L). These findings revealed that the double-layered PG-sand column outperformed a PG single-layered configuration for the removal of most of the ECs. The removal efficiency of ECs from their solutions was improved by increasing PG dosages and filter bed height and size. Although the treatment of mixed pharmaceutical solutions from different water bodies was affected by the negative interference caused by competing water compounds, the treatment of ECs-contaminated greywater was not severely affected. Our findings suggest that PG, as a highly efficient filter medium, could be used for the removal of emerging pharmaceutical contaminants from water and wastewater.

Indexed as

adsorption filtersgraphene-based materialspharmaceutical contaminantsporous graphenewastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID33401475
PMCPMC7824533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.