ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Scientometric Analysis of Safety Sign Research: 1990-2019.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Multifaceted Metabolic Pathology and Mechanisms of NAFLD: A Bibliometric Analysis and an In-depth Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Machine vision-based recognition of safety signs in work environments.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A comparative investigation of machine learning algorithms for predicting safety signs comprehension based on socio-demographic factors and cognitive sign features.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A bibliometric analysis study of blood flow restriction using CiteSpace.Journal of physical therapy science · 2022Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of the Toxicity of Bisphenol A.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Scientometric Analysis of Public Health Emergencies: 1994-2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Intermittent Fasting.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of cerebral revascularization from 1999 to 2022.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000-2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Analysis of EEG Characteristics of Drivers and Driving Safety in Undersea Tunnel.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to summarize the research themes and hotspots of safety signs research between 1990 and 2019 through the scientometric analysis method. In total, 3102 articles of literature from the Web of Science core database were analyzed by the CiteSpace visualization tool and the results were displayed in mapping knowledge domains. The overall characteristics analysis showed that safety sign is an emerging research field in a rapid development stage-81.4% of the literature works were published in the past ten years, and the United States was in the leading position, followed by China and Canada. The keyword co-occurrence analysis indicated that traffic signs and driving safety were the most popular research topics and have been combined with simulation technology in recent years, whereby individual mental health has been added as an influential factor. The journals and category co-citation analysis showed that the safety signs research involved many subjects, mainly engineering, transportation and public safety. The results indicated that the safety signs research is multi-disciplinary, and it will continue to develop in various scientific domains in the future. The conclusions can provide help and reference for potential readers, as well as help with the sustainable development of safety signs research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.