Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33401168›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021

Using multivariate long short-term memory neural network to detect aberrant signals in health data for quality assurance.

Seyed M Miran, Stuart J Nelson, Doug Redd, Qing Zeng-Treitler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyed M MiranBiomedical Informatics Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA. Electronic address: miran@gwu.edu.
Stuart J NelsonBiomedical Informatics Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.
Doug ReddBiomedical Informatics Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.
Qing Zeng-TreitlerBiomedical Informatics Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.
George Washington University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Childrens NationalUL1TR001876 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BELL, MICHAEL J · 2016 to 2021
$25.6M
Use Explainable AI to Improve the Trust of and Detect the Bias of AI ModelsRF1AG069121 · NIA · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOKKINOS, PETER F., ZAMRINI, EDWARD Y · 2020 to 2022
$2.3M
Feasibility of a Therapeutic Intent OntologyR21LM012929 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI NELSON, STUART JAMES · 2018 to 2019
$386k
HSRD VA I01 HX001145HSRD VA I01 HX002422HSRD VA I01 HX002679HSRD VA I21 HX003278NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001876NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG069121NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe data quality of electronic health records (EHR) has been a topic of increasing interest to clinical and health services researchers. One indicator of possible errors in data is a large change in the frequency of observations in chronic illnesses. In this study, we built and demonstrated the utility of a stacked multivariate LSTM model to predict an acceptable range for the frequency of observations.

methodsWe applied the LSTM approach to a large EHR dataset with over 400 million total encounters. We computed sensitivity and specificity for predicting if the frequency of an observation in a given week is an aberrant signal.

resultsCompared with the simple frequency monitoring approach, our proposed multivariate LSTM approach increased the sensitivity of finding aberrant signals in 6 randomly selected diagnostic codes from 75 to 88% and the specificity from 68 to 91%. We also experimented with two different LSTM algorithms, namely, direct multi-step and recursive multi-step. Both models were able to detect the aberrant signals while the recursive multi-step algorithm performed better.

conclusionsSimply monitoring the frequency trend, as is the common practice in systems that do monitor the data quality, would not be able to distinguish between the fluctuations caused by seasonal disease changes, seasonal patient visits, or a change in data sources. Our study demonstrated the ability of stacked multivariate LSTM models to recognize true data quality issues rather than fluctuations that are caused by different reasons, including seasonal changes and outbreaks.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHumansElectronic health recordsHealth data qualityLSTM models

Identifiers

PMID33401168
PMCPMC9518650
OpenAlexW3111150989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.