ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021
Using multivariate long short-term memory neural network to detect aberrant signals in health data for quality assurance.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Are ICD codes reliable for observational studies? Assessing coding consistency for data quality.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe data quality of electronic health records (EHR) has been a topic of increasing interest to clinical and health services researchers. One indicator of possible errors in data is a large change in the frequency of observations in chronic illnesses. In this study, we built and demonstrated the utility of a stacked multivariate LSTM model to predict an acceptable range for the frequency of observations.
methodsWe applied the LSTM approach to a large EHR dataset with over 400 million total encounters. We computed sensitivity and specificity for predicting if the frequency of an observation in a given week is an aberrant signal.
resultsCompared with the simple frequency monitoring approach, our proposed multivariate LSTM approach increased the sensitivity of finding aberrant signals in 6 randomly selected diagnostic codes from 75 to 88% and the specificity from 68 to 91%. We also experimented with two different LSTM algorithms, namely, direct multi-step and recursive multi-step. Both models were able to detect the aberrant signals while the recursive multi-step algorithm performed better.
conclusionsSimply monitoring the frequency trend, as is the common practice in systems that do monitor the data quality, would not be able to distinguish between the fluctuations caused by seasonal disease changes, seasonal patient visits, or a change in data sources. Our study demonstrated the ability of stacked multivariate LSTM models to recognize true data quality issues rather than fluctuations that are caused by different reasons, including seasonal changes and outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.