Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400753›Full record

ArticleNanoscale2021

Injectable, self-healing mesoporous silica nanocomposite hydrogels with improved mechanical properties.

A Zengin, J P O Castro, P Habibovic, S H van Rijt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Peptide Hydrogels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A ZenginDepartment of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering (IBE), MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. s.vanrijt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
J P O CastroDepartment of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering (IBE), MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. s.vanrijt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-3970
P HabibovicDepartment of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering (IBE), MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. s.vanrijt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8249-5155
S H van RijtDepartment of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering (IBE), MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. s.vanrijt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4102-4626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-healing hydrogels have emerged as promising biomaterials in regenerative medicine applications. However, an ongoing challenge is to create hydrogels that combine rapid self-healing with high mechanical strength to make them applicable to a wider range of organs/tissues. Incorporating nanoparticles within hydrogels is a popular strategy to improve the mechanical properties as well as to provide additional functionalities such as stimuli responsiveness or controlled drug delivery, further optimizing their use. In this context, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are promising candidates as they are bioactive, improve mechanical properties, and can controllably release various types of cargo. While commonly nanoparticles are added to hydrogels as filler component, in the current study we developed thiol surface-functionalized MSNs capable of acting as chemical crosslinkers with a known hydrophilic polymer, polyethylene glycol (PEG), through dynamic thiol-disulfide covalent interactions. Due to these dynamic exchange reactions, mechanically strong nanocomposites with a storage modulus of up to 32 ± 5 kPa compared to 1.3 ± 0.3 kPa for PEG hydrogels alone, with rapid self-healing capabilities, could be formed. When non-surface modified MSNs were used, the increase in storage modulus of the hydrogels was significantly lower (3.4 ± 0.7 kPa). In addition, the nanocomposites were shown to degrade slowly over 6 weeks upon exposure to glutathione while remaining intact at physiological conditions. Together, the data argue that creating nanocomposites using MSNs as dynamic crosslinkers is a promising strategy to confer mechanical strength and rapid self-healing capabilities to hydrogels. This approach offers new possibilities for creating multifunctional self-healing biomaterials for a wider range of applications in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

NanocompositesSilicon DioxideHydrogelsNanogelsPolyethylene GlycolsHydrogelsNanogelsPolyethylene GlycolsSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID33400753
PMCPMC8100892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.