Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400719›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Predicting the current and future distribution of the western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus, across the Western US using citizen science collections.

W Tanner Porter, Zachary A Barrand, Julie Wachara, Kaila DaVall, Joseph R Mihaljevic, Talima Pearson, Daniel J Salkeld, Nathan C Nieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ecology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Estimating disease vector population size from citizen science data.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

W Tanner PorterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-0924
Zachary A BarrandDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-7314
Julie WacharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.
Kaila DaVallDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8320-6618
Joseph R MihaljevicSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2320-5773
Talima PearsonPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-041X
Daniel J SalkeldDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
Nathan C NietoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, ticks and tick-borne diseases have expanded their ranges and impact across the US. With this spread, it has become vital to monitor vector and disease distributions, as these shifts have public health implications. Typically, tick-borne disease surveillance (e.g., Lyme disease) is passive and relies on case reports, while disease risk is calculated using active surveillance, where researchers collect ticks from the environment. Case reports provide the basis for estimating the number of cases; however, they provide minimal information on vector population or pathogen dynamics. Active surveillance monitors ticks and sylvatic pathogens at local scales, but it is resource-intensive. As a result, data are often sparse and aggregated across time and space to increase statistical power to model or identify range changes. Engaging public participation in surveillance efforts allows spatially and temporally diverse samples to be collected with minimal effort. These citizen-driven tick collections have the potential to provide a powerful tool for tracking vector and pathogen changes. We used MaxEnt species distribution models to predict the current and future distribution of Ixodes pacificus across the Western US through the use of a nationwide citizen science tick collection program. Here, we present niche models produced through citizen science tick collections over two years. Despite obvious limitations with citizen science collections, the models are consistent with previously-predicted species ranges in California that utilized more than thirty years of traditional surveillance data. Additionally, citizen science allows for an expanded understanding of I. pacificus distribution in Oregon and Washington. With the potential for rapid environmental changes instigated by a burgeoning human population and rapid climate change, the development of tools, concepts, and methodologies that provide rapid, current, and accurate assessment of important ecological qualities will be invaluable for monitoring and predicting disease across time and space.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionCitizen ScienceAnimalsArthropod VectorsCaliforniaClimateClimate ChangeHumansIxodesLyme DiseaseNorthwestern United StatesSeasonsTick Infestations

Identifiers

PMID33400719
PMCPMC7785219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.