ArticlePloS one2021
Predicting the current and future distribution of the western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus, across the Western US using citizen science collections.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring prediction of tick and tick-borne encephalitis cases in Sweden using citizen science data.iScience · 2026Article
- Mapping the Potential Geographic Distribution of the Heartwater Disease Vector TickAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Geographical dataset of questing nymphal density for three key tick vector species of Lyme disease.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A call for the informatics community to define priority practice and research areas at the intersection of climate and health: report from 2023 mini-summit.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Viral Diversity and Ecological Impact of DNA Viruses in Dominant Tick Species in China.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Metatranscriptomic investigation of singlemSystems · 2024Article
- Forensic parasitology: a new frontier in criminalistics.Forensic sciences research · 2024Review
- History of the geographic distribution of the western blacklegged tick, Ixodes pacificus, in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2024Review
- Predicting the potential global distribution of Ixodes pacificus under climate change.PloS one · 2024Article
- Assessing the Influence of Climate Change and Environmental Factors on the Top Tick-Borne Diseases in the United States: A Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Ecological Niche Modelling Approaches: Challenges and Applications in Vector-Borne Diseases.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
- Northward Expansion of Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) into Southwestern Michigan.Journal of medical entomology · 2022Article
- Modeling Geographic Uncertainty in Current and Future Habitat for Potential Populations of Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Alaska.Journal of medical entomology · 2022Article
- Ecology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Estimating disease vector population size from citizen science data.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Article
- Predicting the Potential Global Distribution ofBiology · 2021Article
- Modeling future climate suitability for the western blacklegged tick, Ixodes pacificus, in California with an emphasis on land access and ownership.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2021Article
- Impact of climate change on rheumatic diseases: A scoping review.The journal of climate change and healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, ticks and tick-borne diseases have expanded their ranges and impact across the US. With this spread, it has become vital to monitor vector and disease distributions, as these shifts have public health implications. Typically, tick-borne disease surveillance (e.g., Lyme disease) is passive and relies on case reports, while disease risk is calculated using active surveillance, where researchers collect ticks from the environment. Case reports provide the basis for estimating the number of cases; however, they provide minimal information on vector population or pathogen dynamics. Active surveillance monitors ticks and sylvatic pathogens at local scales, but it is resource-intensive. As a result, data are often sparse and aggregated across time and space to increase statistical power to model or identify range changes. Engaging public participation in surveillance efforts allows spatially and temporally diverse samples to be collected with minimal effort. These citizen-driven tick collections have the potential to provide a powerful tool for tracking vector and pathogen changes. We used MaxEnt species distribution models to predict the current and future distribution of Ixodes pacificus across the Western US through the use of a nationwide citizen science tick collection program. Here, we present niche models produced through citizen science tick collections over two years. Despite obvious limitations with citizen science collections, the models are consistent with previously-predicted species ranges in California that utilized more than thirty years of traditional surveillance data. Additionally, citizen science allows for an expanded understanding of I. pacificus distribution in Oregon and Washington. With the potential for rapid environmental changes instigated by a burgeoning human population and rapid climate change, the development of tools, concepts, and methodologies that provide rapid, current, and accurate assessment of important ecological qualities will be invaluable for monitoring and predicting disease across time and space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.