Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400684›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Knowledge About COVID-19 in Brazil: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Study.

Vinícius Henrique Almeida Guimarães, Maísa de Oliveira-Leandro, Carolina Cassiano, Anna Laura Piantino Marques, Clara Motta, Ana Letícia Freitas-Silva, Marlos Aureliano Dias de Sousa, Luciano Alves Matias Silveira, Thiago César Pardi, Fernanda Castro Gazotto and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamics of social corrections to peers sharing COVID-19 misinformation on WhatsApp in Brazil.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vinícius Henrique Almeida Guimarães *Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7411-3353
Maísa de Oliveira-Leandro *Laboratory of Immunology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-7469
Carolina CassianoInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-2538
Anna Laura Piantino MarquesInstitute of Language Studies, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-6551
Clara MottaInstitute of Language Studies, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1015-8990
Ana Letícia Freitas-SilvaInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4896-3143
Marlos Aureliano Dias de SousaInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-2831
Luciano Alves Matias SilveiraInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5344-8667
Thiago César PardiInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1875-4698
Fernanda Castro GazottoInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4179-5703
Marcos Vinícius SilvaLaboratory of Immunology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-7621
Virmondes RodriguesLaboratory of Immunology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8706-4223
Wellington Francisco RodriguesLaboratory of Immunology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3426-2186
Carlo Jose Freire OliveiraLaboratory of Immunology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-7333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is a highly transmissible illness caused by SARS-CoV-2. The disease has affected more than 200 countries, and the measures that have been implemented to combat its spread, as there is still no vaccine or definitive medication, have been based on supportive interventions and drug repositioning. Brazil, the largest country in South America, has had more than 140,000 recorded deaths and is one of the most affected countries. Despite the extensive quantity of scientifically recognized information, there are still conflicting discussions on how best to face the disease and the virus, especially with regard to social distancing, preventive methods, and the use of medications.

objectiveThe main purpose of this study is to evaluate the Brazilian population's basic knowledge about COVID-19 to demonstrate how Brazilians are managing to identify scientifically proven information.

methodsA cross-sectional study design was used. An original online questionnaire survey was administered from June 16 to August 21, 2020, across all five different geopolitical regions of the country (ie, the North, Northeast, Center-West, Southeast, and South). The questionnaire was comprised of questions about basic aspects of COVID-19, such as the related symptoms, conduct that should be followed when suspected of infection, risk groups, prevention, transmission, and social distancing. The wrong questionnaire response alternatives were taken from the fake news combat website of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Participants (aged ≥18 years) were recruited through social networking platforms, including Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter. The mean distributions, frequencies, and similarities or dissimilarities between the responses for the different variables of the study were evaluated. The significance level for all statistical tests was less than .05.

resultsA total of 4180 valid responses representative of all the states and regions of Brazil were recorded. Most respondents had good knowledge about COVID-19, getting an average of 86.59% of the total score with regard to the basic aspects of the disease. The region, education level, age, sex, and social condition had a significant association (P<.001) with knowledge about the disease, which meant that women, the young, those with higher education levels, nonrecipients of social assistance, and more economically and socially developed regions had more correct answers.

conclusionsOverall, Brazilians with social media access have a good level of basic knowledge about COVID-19 but with differences depending on the analyzed subgroup. Due to the limitation of the platform used in carrying out the study, care should be taken when generalizing the study findings to populations with less education or who are not used to accessing social networking platforms.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedBrazilCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth EducationHumansMiddle AgedSocial MediaSocial NetworkingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBrazilcoronavirusCOVID-19cross-sectionalhealth informationknowledgeonline surveyperception

Identifiers

PMID33400684
PMCPMC7822056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.