Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400590›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2021

Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores.

Brooks Paige, James Bell, Aurélien Bellet, Adrià Gascón, Daphne Ezer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brooks PaigeThe Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom.
James BellThe Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Aurélien BelletInria, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne Park Plaza, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Adrià GascónThe Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Daphne EzerThe Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some organizations such as 23andMe and the UK Biobank have large genomic databases that they re-use for multiple different genome-wide association studies. Even research studies that compile smaller genomic databases often utilize these databases to investigate many related traits. It is common for the study to report a genetic risk score (GRS) model for each trait within the publication. Here, we show that under some circumstances, these GRS models can be used to recover the genetic variants of individuals in these genomic databases-a reconstruction attack. In particular, if two GRS models are trained by using a largely overlapping set of participants, it is often possible to determine the genotype for each of the individuals who were used to train one GRS model, but not the other. We demonstrate this theoretically and experimentally by analyzing the Cornell Dog Genome database. The accuracy of our reconstruction attack depends on how accurately we can estimate the rate of co-occurrence of pairs of single nucleotide polymorphisms within the private database, so if this aggregate information is ever released, it would drastically reduce the security of a private genomic database. Caution should be applied when using the same database for multiple analysis, especially when a small number of individuals are included or excluded from one part of the study.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenetic VariationAnimalsBiological Specimen BanksComputational BiologyComputer SecurityDogsGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping TechniquesHumansModels, GeneticRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomgenetic risk scoresgenomic privacyGWASlong-term privacyreconstruction attack

Identifiers

PMID33400590
PMCPMC8165474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.