Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400439›Full record

Observational studyPain physician2021

Visit Frequency and Outcomes for Patients Using Ongoing Chiropractic Care for Chronic Low-Back and Neck Pain: An Observational Longitudinal Study.

Patricia M Herman, Sarah E Edgington, Melony E Sorbero, Eric L Hurwitz, Christine M Goertz, Ian D Coulter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pain physician, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03162952 (RAND Center of Excellence for the Study of Appropriateness of Care in CAM), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03162952 completednot on this map

RAND Center of Excellence for the Study of Appropriateness of Care in CAM

TypeobservationalSponsorRANDRan2011 to 2018Enrolled2,025ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain, Chronic Neck Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia M HermanRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Sarah E EdgingtonRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Melony E SorberoRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Eric L HurwitzRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA; Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawaii, M?noa, Honolulu, HI.
Christine M GoertzDuke University, Durham, NC.
Ian D CoulterRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA; 2University of California Los Angeles, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA; Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA.
RAND Corporation · USDuke University · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

Systematic Review Core (SRC)/Ian D. CoulterU19AT007912 · NCCIH · RAND CORPORATION · PI COULTER, IAN DOUGLASS, HERMAN, PATRICIA M · 2013 to 2017
$8.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT007912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic spinal pain is prevalent and long-lasting. Although provider-based nonpharmacologic therapies, such as chiropractic care, have been recommended, healthcare and coverage policies provide little guidance or evidence regarding long-term use of this care.

objectiveTo determine the relationships between visit frequency and outcomes for patients using ongoing chiropractic care for chronic spinal pain. STUDY

designObservational 3-month longitudinal study.

settingData collected from patients of 124 chiropractic clinics in 6 United States regions.

methodsWe examined the impact of visit frequency and patient characteristics on pain (pain 0-10 numeric rating scale) and functional outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] for low-back pain and Neck Disability Index [NDI] for neck pain, both 0-100 scale) using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) in a large national sample of chiropractic patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and/or chronic neck pain (CNP). This study was approved by the RAND Human Subjects Protection Committee and registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162952.

resultsOne thousand, three hundred, sixty-two patients with CLBP and 1,214 with CNP were included in a series of HLM models. Unconditional (time-only) models showed patients on average had mild pain and function, and significant, but slight improvements in these over the 3-month observation period: back and neck pain decreased by 0.40 and 0.44 points, respectively; function improved by 2.7 (ODI) and 3.0 points (NDI) (all P < 0.001). Adding chiropractic visit frequency to the models revealed that those with worse baseline pain and function used more visits, but only visits more than once per week for those with CLBP were associated with significantly better improvement. These relationships remained when other types of visits and baseline patient characteristics were included. LIMITATIONS: This is an observational study based on self-reported data from a sample representative of chiropractic patients, but not all patients with CLBP or CNP.

conclusionsThis 3-month window on chiropractic patients with CLBP and/or CNP revealed that they were improving, although slowly; may have reached maximum therapeutic improvement; and are possibly successfully managing their chronic pain using a variety of chiropractic visit frequencies. These results may inform payers when building coverage policies for ongoing chiropractic care for patients with chronic pain.

Indexed as

AdultChiropracticChronic PainFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPain ManagementTreatment OutcomeUnited Stateschiropractic visitsChronic low back painchronic neck painhealthcare utilizationhierarchical linear modelinginsurance coveragephysical functionspinal pain

Identifiers

PMID33400439
PMCPMC8667562
OpenAlexW3119135035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.