Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400389›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Preventive effect of aspirin on preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women with stage 1 hypertension.

Jing Huai, Li Lin, Juan Juan, Jiahui Chen, Boya Li, Yuchun Zhu, Mengting Yu, Huixia Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Prevention of preeclampsia by aspirin consumption in high-risk pregnancies that can be complicated with preeclampsia: A systematic review.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing HuaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1538-5500
Li LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Juan JuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiahui ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Boya LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuchun ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mengting YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huixia YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-2102
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies reported that women in a low-risk cohort with stage 1 hypertension defined as 130-139 mmHg/80-89 mmHg, according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, are more likely to develop into preeclampsia than women with normotensive in the early gestation. In this study, the authors investigated whether preeclampsia was more likely to occur in stage 1 hypertensive women compared to the normotensive pregnant women in a high-risk cohort, which was based on the randomized controlled trial of "Low-dose Aspirin in the Prevention of Preeclampsia in China." Meanwhile, the authors further evaluated the preventive effect of aspirin for preeclampsia in stage 1 hypertension subset. In women enrolled at or before 16 weeks of gestation, in the control group, the preeclampsia occurrence was significantly higher in stage 1 hypertensive woman than in the normotensive women (20.4% vs. 6.2%, aOR 3.960, 95% CI 1.299-12.074, p = .016), while no difference was observed in the aspirin group (4.5% vs. 4.2%, aOR 0.921, 95% CI 0.140-6.070, p = .932). In stage 1 hypertension, the incidences of preeclampsia and preterm birth were significantly lower in the aspirin group as compared to the control group (4.5% vs. 20.4%, aOR 0.139, 95% CI 0.027-0.716, p = .018; 4.5% vs. 18.4%, aOR 0.141, 95% CI 0.025-0.782, p = .025). Compared with the control group, the aspirin group displayed significantly prolonged gestational age at delivery (38.6 ± 1.2 vs. 37.4 ± 3.4, p = .042). This study indicates that the newly classified stage 1 hypertension might be an additional risk factor for preeclampsia in Chinese high-risk pregnant women, and aspirin intervention might be useful.

Indexed as

HypertensionPre-EclampsiaPremature BirthAspirinChinaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleAspirinaspirinpreeclampsiapregnancyrisk factorsstage 1 hypertension

Identifiers

PMID33400389
PMCPMC8678830
OpenAlexW3120778017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.