Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400237›Full record

Trial reportBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2021

Administration of CD4

Kamil Chwojnicki, Dorota Iwaszkiewicz-Grześ, Anna Jankowska, Maciej Zieliński, Paweł Łowiec, Mateusz Gliwiński, Małgorzata Grzywińska, Kamil Kowalczyk, Aleksandra Konarzewska, Paulina Glasner and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immune reconstitution and tolerance-inducing therapies as promising therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Local control of T cell fate in lymph nodes safely and durably reverses myelin-driven autoimmunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Regulatory T Cell-Based Adoptive Cell Therapy in Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Yerba Mate (Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamil ChwojnickiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Dorota Iwaszkiewicz-GrześDepartment of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna JankowskaSecond Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 2, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Maciej ZielińskiDepartment of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Paweł ŁowiecDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Mateusz GliwińskiDepartment of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Małgorzata GrzywińskaSecond Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 2, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Kamil KowalczykDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Aleksandra KonarzewskaSecond Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 2, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Paulina GlasnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Justyna SakowskaDepartment of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Julia KulczyckaDepartment of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna Jaźwińska-CuryłłoRegional Center of Blood Donation and Treatment, Hoene-Wrońskiego 4, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Marlena KubachDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bartosz KaraszewskiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Walenty NykaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Edyta SzurowskaSecond Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 2, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Piotr TrzonkowskiDepartment of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki 7, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland. piotr.trzonkowski@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5287-5210
Gdańsk Medical University · PLTricomed (Poland) · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju STRATEGMED1/233368/1/NCBR/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease in which autoimmune T conventional (T

methodsWe present the results of a phase 1b/2a, open-label, two-arm clinical trial in 14 patients treated with autologous T

resultsNo severe adverse events were observed. Self-assessed quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D] form) did not change and did not differ significantly between the groups. A total of 12 relapses were noted in five intravenously treated patients, who had from one to three attacks per year. Three out of ten participants who completed the trial in the IV group deteriorated more than 1 point on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) during the follow-up. At the same time, no patients in the IT group experienced a relapse or such a deterioration in the EDSS. No significant differences were found in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) scale in both the IV and IT groups. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans revealed a significantly lower change in the T2 lesion volume in the IT group compared to the IV group. The increase in the number of new T2 lesions during the follow-up was significant for the IV group only. There were no significant changes in the level of T

conclusionsNo serious adverse events were reported in the 14 patients with MS treated with T

trial registrationEudraCT: 2014-004320-22; registered 18 November 2014.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansQuality of LifeRecurrenceT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33400237
OpenAlexW3118712190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.