ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2021
Diagnostic muscle biopsies in the era of genetics: the added value of myopathology in a selection of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy patients.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Clinical Study on the Utility of Muscle Biopsy in Patients with Suspected Myopathy.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- [Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy-10. Case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the second most common dystrophy associated with predominant pelvic and shoulder girdle muscle weakness termed Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD), genetic complexity, large phenotypic variability, and clinical overlap can result in extensive diagnostic delays in certain individuals. In view of the large strides genetics has taken in this day and age, we address the question if muscle biopsies can still provide diagnostic evidence of substance for these patients. We reviewed and reanalyzed muscle biopsy characteristics in a cohort of LGMD patient pairs in which gene variants were picked up in CAPN3, FKRP, TTN, and ANO5, using histochemical-immunohistochemical-and immunofluorescent staining, and western blotting. We found that not the nature and severity of inflammatory changes, but the changed properties of the dystrophin complex were the most valuable assets to differentiate LGMD from myositis. Proteomic evaluation brought both primary and secondary deficiencies to light, which could be equally revealing for diagnosis. Though a muscle biopsy might, at present, not always be strictly necessary anymore, it still represents an irrefutable asset when the genetic diagnosis is complicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.