Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400223›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2021

Diagnostic muscle biopsies in the era of genetics: the added value of myopathology in a selection of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy patients.

Boel De Paepe, Elise Velghe, Linnea Salminen, Balint Toth, Pieter Olivier, Jan L De Bleecker

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy-10. Case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boel De PaepeDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Neuropathology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. boel.depaepe@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9403-4401
Elise VelgheDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Neuropathology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Linnea SalminenDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Neuropathology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Balint TothDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Neuropathology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter OlivierDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Neuropathology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan L De BleeckerDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Neuropathology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

IFMSA SCORE 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the second most common dystrophy associated with predominant pelvic and shoulder girdle muscle weakness termed Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD), genetic complexity, large phenotypic variability, and clinical overlap can result in extensive diagnostic delays in certain individuals. In view of the large strides genetics has taken in this day and age, we address the question if muscle biopsies can still provide diagnostic evidence of substance for these patients. We reviewed and reanalyzed muscle biopsy characteristics in a cohort of LGMD patient pairs in which gene variants were picked up in CAPN3, FKRP, TTN, and ANO5, using histochemical-immunohistochemical-and immunofluorescent staining, and western blotting. We found that not the nature and severity of inflammatory changes, but the changed properties of the dystrophin complex were the most valuable assets to differentiate LGMD from myositis. Proteomic evaluation brought both primary and secondary deficiencies to light, which could be equally revealing for diagnosis. Though a muscle biopsy might, at present, not always be strictly necessary anymore, it still represents an irrefutable asset when the genetic diagnosis is complicated.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyCohort StudiesExome SequencingFemaleGenetic VariationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle WeaknessMuscular Dystrophies, Limb-GirdleProteomicsYoung AdultDiagnostic muscle biopsyLimb-girdle muscular dystrophyMuscle inflammationMuscular dystrophyMyopathology

Identifiers

PMID33400223
OpenAlexW3118308976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.