Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400218›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Vestibular and Ocular/Oculomotor Assessment Strategies and Outcomes Following Sports-Related Concussion: A Scoping Review.

Carolina P Quintana, Tamara C Valovich McLeod, Anne D Olson, Nicholas R Heebner, Matthew C Hoch

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolina P QuintanaDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Services, California State University, 5275 N. Campus Dr. M/S SG28, Fresno, CA, 93740-8018, USA. carolinaquintana@mail.fresnostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4551-7540
Tamara C Valovich McLeodDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, A. T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Anne D OlsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Nicholas R HeebnerDepartment of Athletic Training and Clinical Nutition, Sports Medicine Research Institute, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Matthew C HochDepartment of Athletic Training and Clinical Nutition, Sports Medicine Research Institute, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent literature has identified that the vestibular system is often involved following a sport-related concussion. Furthermore, the consequences of vestibular and ocular/oculomotor involvement have been explored and identified as potential predictors for prolonged recovery. Although vestibular and ocular/oculomotor involvement is common following head injury, the clinical assessment strategies for vestibular function are less commonly practiced in the sports medicine setting and have limited research. Therefore, despite the suspected link between vestibular consequences of concussion and prolonged recovery time, there is limited understanding on how these consequences affect outcomes following concussion and how to properly assess these functions.

objectivesThe objectives of this scoping review were to: (1) outline the current clinical assessment strategies for vestibular and ocular/oculomotor function in sports medicine to identify the best strategies for assessment, and (2) investigate the evidence regarding the influence of vestibular and ocular/oculomotor function on outcomes for patients with a sport-related concussion.

methodsTwo separate and independent reviews of the current literature were conducted to provide evidence for each specified objective. Studies for potential inclusion were identified through electronic database searches. Inclusion criteria for each objective were used to identify the most effective studies and inquiries to address the outlined objectives.

resultsThe identified and included studies provided evidence-based information regarding the current assessment strategies as well as outcomes following concussion.

conclusionDespite agreement among studies, there was limited evidence to support each aim, identifying a need for further exploration into these objectives.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionSportsSports MedicineHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.