Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400075›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2021

Alternative splicing modulates cancer aggressiveness: role in EMT/metastasis and chemoresistance.

Debanwita Roy Burman, Shalini Das, Chandrima Das, Rahul Bhattacharya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Factors Determining Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Characterization of Alternative Splicing in High-Risk Wilms' Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Impact of cell plasticity on prostate tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic response.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. RNA-binding proteins regulating the CD44 alternative splicing.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Debanwita Roy Burman *Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, Major Arterial Road (South-East), AA II, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700135, India.
Shalini Das *Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, Major Arterial Road (South-East), AA II, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700135, India.
Chandrima DasAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, Major Arterial Road (South-East), AA II, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700135, India.
Rahul Bhattacharya *Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, Major Arterial Road (South-East), AA II, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700135, India. rbhattacharya@kol.amity.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-7491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced metastasis and disease recurrence accounts for the high mortality rates associated with cancer. The process of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) contributes towards the augmentation of cancer invasiveness along with the gain of stem-like and the subsequent drug-resistant behavior. Apart from the well-established transcriptional regulation, EMT is also controlled post-transcriptionally by virtue of alternative splicing (AS). Numerous genes including Fibroblast Growth Factor receptor (FGFR) as well as CD44 are differentially spliced during this trans-differentiation process which, in turn, governs cancer progression. These splicing alterations are controlled by various splicing factors including ESRP, RBFOX2 as well as hnRNPs. Here, we have depicted the mechanisms governing the splice isoform switching of FGFR and CD44. Moreover, the role of the splice variants generated by AS of these gene transcripts in modulating the metastatic potential and stem-like/chemoresistant behavior of cancer cells has also been highlighted. Additionally, the involvement of splicing factors in regulating EMT/invasiveness along with drug-resistance as well as the metabolic properties of the cells has been emphasized. Tumorigenesis is accompanied by a remodeling of the cellular splicing profile generating diverse protein isoforms which, in turn, control the cancer-associated hallmarks. Therefore, we have also briefly discussed about a wide variety of genes which are differentially spliced in the tumor cells and promote cancer progression. We have also outlined different strategies for targeting the tumor-associated splicing events which have shown promising results and therefore this approach might be useful in developing therapies to reduce cancer aggressiveness in a more specific manner.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinogenesisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeterogeneous-Nuclear RibonucleoproteinsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorRepressor ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsCD44 protein, humanESRP1 protein, humanHeterogeneous-Nuclear RibonucleoproteinsHyaluronan ReceptorsRBFOX2 protein, humanReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorRepressor ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA Splicing FactorsAlternative SplicingCancer therapyChemoresistanceEMT/metastasisFGFR/CD44Splicing Factors

Identifiers

PMID33400075
OpenAlexW3118842990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.