Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33400064›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2021

Assessment of the image quality of virtual monochromatic spectral computed tomography images: a phantom study considering object contrast, radiation dose, and frequency characteristics.

Shota Masuda, Koichi Sugisawa, Kazuya Minamishima, Akihisa Yamazaki, Masahiro Jinzaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shota MasudaOffice of Radiological Technology, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan. shota.masuda@adst.keio.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-9349
Koichi SugisawaOffice of Radiological Technology, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Kazuya MinamishimaOffice of Radiological Technology, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Akihisa YamazakiOffice of Radiological Technology, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Masahiro JinzakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast kilovoltage (kVp)-switching technology cannot obtain conventional 120 kVp images; thus, 70 keV virtual monochromatic spectral computed tomography (CT) images (VMSI) are generally used. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is used to evaluate the image quality of VMSI; however, CNR does not include frequency characteristics. The present study aimed to investigate the evaluation methods of VMSI considering frequency characteristics by comparing the image quality of 70 keV VMSI with that of conventional 120 kVp images. The evaluated object contrasts were 70 and 300 Hounsfield units (HU). Scans used two radiation dose levels: low (LD) and standard (SD). The volume CT dose index of LD and SD was 4.8- and 12 mGy, respectively. Images were reconstructed by filtered back projection, evaluating CNR, noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and system performance (SP) function calculated as TTF

Indexed as

Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioComputed tomographyDual-energy computed tomographyFast kilovoltage switchingTask-based image qualityVirtual monochromatic spectral computed tomography images

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.