ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021
Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative study between open pre-peritoneal approach versus laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair: a prospective cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Trial
- ReTAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia after laparoscopic repair: extended experience and comparative analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Redo TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia After TEP/TAPP: Outcomes and feasibility.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Telemedicine-enabled surveillance after hernia repair: A prospective programmatic experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy of intraperitoneal positive pressure gas expulsion in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- A new groin hernia classification with clinical relevance.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Feasibility and safety of redo laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia following previous endolaparoscopic repair.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- The impact of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia treatment: A retrospective cohort study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Aging Patients: A Propensity Score Matching-Based Retrospective Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
- Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2022Article
- Comment on: "Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair".Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor inguinal hernia recurrences, the European Hernia Society guidelines recommend laparo-endoscopic repair (LR) following a previous open surgery (OS) and, conversely, OS following previous laparo-endoscopic repair. Laparoscopic treatment of recurrences after previous LR is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and reliability of a repeated transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic repair (reTAPP) for a recurrent hernia.
methodsWe analyzed and compared a series of patients with recurrent inguinal hernia after LR who underwent repair by a conventional approach with similar patients who underwent reTAPP between January 2010 and December 2018.
resultsBetween January 2010 and December 2018, 2488 transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia (TAPP) repairs were performed. Recurrence was observed in 46 (1.8%). Of these patients, 18 (39%; Group 1; G1) underwent conventional open repair (Lichtenstein technique) and 28 (61%; Group 2; G2) reTAPP. In G2, repair was successful in 24 patients (86%); however, four cases (14%) needed conversion to OS because of technical difficulties. Two patients re-recurred (4.3%), one in G1 which was resolved in a third approach with a reTAPP and the other in G2 which was resolved with OS.
conclusionReTAPP surgery for recurrences after previous TAPP repair proved to be safe and was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and morbidity and recurrence rates comparable to OS at a highly specialized center. Randomized studies with a larger number of cases are necessary to confirm these findings and draw more robust and objective conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.