Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399986›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2021

Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) and Its Polymorphic Variants as Predictive Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers of NSCLCs: a Perspective.

Tapan K Mukherjee, Parth Malik, John R Hoidal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tapan K Mukherjee *Division of Respiratory, Critical Care and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. tapanmu@yahoo.com.
Parth Malik *School of Chemical Sciences, Central University of Gujarat (Gandhinagar), Gandhinagar, India.
John R HoidalDivision of Respiratory, Critical Care and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Central University of Gujarat · INGeorge E. Wahlen Department of VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNon-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) account for ~ 85% of all lung cancers, and 5-year survival in Europe and the USA is ~ 13-17%. In this review, we focus on the significance of Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products (RAGE) as a diagnostic or post-therapeutic prognostic marker for various forms of NSCLCs. RECENT

findingsThe lungs have the highest levels of basal RAGE expression in mammals. The physiologic RAGE in lungs may be involved in adhesion and spreading of AT-1 cells and maintenance of pulmonary homeostasis. However, high level expression of RAGE complicates various diseases including acute lung injury. In NSCLCs, while a number of studies report decreased RAGE expression, inferring a protective role, others suggest that RAGE expression may contribute to NSCLC pathogenesis. Genetic polymorphisms of RAGE are reportedly associated with NSCLC development and complications. RAGE and its polymorphic variants may be useful diagnostic or post-therapeutic prognostic markers of NSCLCs.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsHumansPolymorphism, GeneticPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsAlveolar type 1 (AT-1) epithelial cellsLung cancer diagnosis and post-therapeutic prognosisNon-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs)Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products (RAGE)

Identifiers

PMID33399986
OpenAlexW3118495362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.