Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399963›Full record

ArticleMedical molecular morphology2021

Endometrial cancer with a POLE mutation progresses frequently through the type I pathway despite its high-grade endometrioid morphology: a cohort study at a single institution in Japan.

Mahina Monsur, Munekage Yamaguchi, Hironori Tashiro, Kumiko Yoshinobu, Fumitaka Saito, Chimeddulam Erdenebaatar, Chenyan Li, Yutaka Iwagoi, Takashi Ohba, Ken-Ichi Iyama and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical molecular morphology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mahina MonsurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Munekage YamaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. munekage@hotmail.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-7038
Hironori TashiroDepartment of Woman's Health Sciences and Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumiko YoshinobuDivision of Genomics, Institute of Resource Development and Analysis, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Fumitaka SaitoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Chimeddulam ErdenebaatarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Chenyan LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yutaka IwagoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takashi OhbaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Ken-Ichi IyamaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Kumamoto General Hospital, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hidetaka KatabuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JPKumamoto Health Science University · JPKumamoto Medical Center · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP16K11145JSPS KAKENHI JP18K16806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

POLE-mutated endometrial cancer (EC) frequently shows high-grade endometrioid histology, which represents heterogeneity in the dualistic classification of EC. This study aimed to assess the clinicopathology and pathogenesis of POLE-mutated EC due to the scarcity of related information for Asian women. POLE variants were sequenced in tissues of Japanese women with EC. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) was assessed in tissues with a POLE variant of unknown significance. In the POLE-mutated EC tissues, the immunostaining expression of CD8, hormonal receptors, and p53 was evaluated, and the POLE variants in cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) lesions were assessed by laser-capture microdissection. POLE variants were identified in five patients (3.9%) with high-grade endometrioid carcinoma among 127 patients with EC (S459F in two tissues and P441P in three tissues with a high TMB). The five cancer tissues coexisted with normal endometrium and/or AEH. Both AEH and cancer cells showed hormonal receptor positivity and harbored the same POLE mutation. Two patients showed a subclonal overexpression pattern of p53 in cancer and AEH lesions. In conclusion, POLE-mutated EC progresses through the type I pathway, even though it frequently shows high-grade endometrioid morphology. The common POLE mutation sites in EC might vary among races.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleCarcinoma, EndometrioidCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA Polymerase IIEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIPOLE protein, humanPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsEndometrial cancerHigh-grade endometrioid carcinomaPOLE mutationRacial differencesSynonymous mutationTP53 mutationTumor mutation burdenType I endometrial cancer

Identifiers

PMID33399963
OpenAlexW3120394820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.