Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399905›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Mechanisms of hiatus failure in prolapse: a multifaceted evaluation.

Emily M English, Luyun Chen, Anne G Sammarco, Giselle E Kolenic, Wenjin Cheng, James A Ashton-Miller, John O DeLancey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily M EnglishDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Luyun ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anne G SammarcoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Giselle E KolenicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Wenjin ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James A Ashton-MillerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John O DeLanceyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. delancey@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-7713

Funding

Mechanisms of anterior vaginal wall support failureR01HD038665 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DELANCEY, JOHN O.L. · 2000 to 2014
$3.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe investigated whether factors influencing pelvic floor hiatal closure are inter-related or independent, hypothesizing that (1) hiatus size is moderately correlated with levator defect, pelvic floor muscle strength, and change in hiatus size with contraction and (2) urogenital hiatus (UGH) and levator hiatus (LH) measures are similar in patients with anterior wall (AW) and posterior wall (PW) prolapse.

methodsThis cross-sectional case-control study included subjects with AW prolapse (n = 50), PW prolapse (n = 50), and normal support (n = 50). Hiatus measurements and levator defects were assessed on MRI, and vaginal closure force was measured with an instrumented speculum. Pearson correlation coefficients and simple and multivariable linear regression models were performed.

resultsDuring contraction, LH narrowed 47% more in the PW compared to AW group (p = 0.001). With straining, LH lengthened 34% more in the PW than AW group (p < 0.001). With straining, UGH and LH lengthening was greater by 72% and 44% in those with major compared to no/minor defect (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). Contraction strength explained, at most, 4% of UGH (r = 0.17) or LH (r = 0.20) shortening during contraction (r = 0.17 and r = 0.20, respectively), indicating that these factors are largely independent. After controlling for prolapse size, resting UGH and levator defect status were associated with straining UGH (p < 0.001, p = 0.004), but muscle strength and resting tone were not.

conclusionsHiatus measures are complex and differ according to prolapse occurrence and type. They are, at best, only weakly correlated with pelvic floor muscle strength and movement during contraction.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalUltrasonographyVaginaLevator defectLevator hiatusMRIMuscle strengthUrogenital hiatus

Identifiers

PMID33399905
PMCPMC8205949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.