Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399902›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

French validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA revised (PISQ-IR).

Brigitte Fatton, Jean-François Hermieu, Jean-Philippe Lucot, Philippe Debodinance, Florence Cour, Sandrine Alonso, Renaud de Tayrac

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01632839 (Psychometric Validation of a French Version of the PISQ-R and a New Questionnaire About Sexuality), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01632839 completednot on this map

Psychometric Validation of a French Version of the PISQ-R and a New Questionnaire About Sexuality: Tools for Evaluating Sexuality in Patients With From Urinary Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2013 to 2017Enrolled298ConditionsSexuality, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence, Fecal Incontinence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brigitte FattonObstertrics and Gynecology Department, CHU Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
Jean-François HermieuUrology Department, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France.
Jean-Philippe LucotService de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, groupe des hôpitaux de l'institut catholique de Lille (GHICL), boulevard de Belfort, 59000, Lille, France.
Philippe DebodinanceObstertrics and Gynecology Department, Dunkerque Hospital, Dunkerque, France.
Florence CourUrology Department, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Sandrine AlonsoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), CHU Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
Renaud de TayracObstertrics and Gynecology Department, CHU Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France. renaud.detayrac@chu-nimes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to clinically validate the French-translated PISQ-IR in a French-speaking population of women with pelvic floor disorders.

methodsWe aimed to recruit 300 women to account for potential attrition secondary to failure to respond or loss to follow-up. Women were enrolled as part of an RCT and from a separate specific study. Both studies included surgically managed patients. Data were collected at recruitment, visit 1 (V1), V2 (9-12 months postoperatively) and V3 (V2 + 5-15 days). Participants also completed a PFDI 20, ICI-Q and FSFI and were assessed by POP-Q.

resultsA total of 297 women were recruited between 18 January 2013 and 18 January 2016. Data were available for 291, 148 and 110 participants at V1, V2 and V3, respectively. The non-response rate for the NSA items varied from 5% to 30%, while for SA women, the non-response rate for the items varied from 0% to 15%. The tool was deemed reliable for five domains of the summary score. We also identified that several sections demonstrated acceptable to good temporal stability. A statistically significant score change was identified in different domains in the participants categorized as improved on either PGI-I or POP-Q. We also identified moderate to strong correlations between PISQ-IR and FSFI.

conclusionsThe French translated PISQ-IR has several strengths in support of its validity. Our findings confirm the validity of the summary scores in addition to the item-based initial scoring system.

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersPelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary IncontinenceFemaleHumansSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesAnal incontinencePelvic floor dysfunctionPelvic organ prolapse, POPPISQSexual functionUIUrinary incontinenceValidation

Identifiers

PMID33399902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.