Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399858›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Noninvasive Prediction of Occult Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric Cancer Using Deep Learning.

Yuming Jiang, Xiaokun Liang, Wei Wang, Chuanli Chen, Qingyu Yuan, Xiaodong Zhang, Na Li, Hao Chen, Jiang Yu, Yaoqin Xie and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuming JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Xiaokun LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Wei WangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Chuanli ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qingyu YuanDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Na LiShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiang YuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yaoqin XieShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yikai XuDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiwei ZhouDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruijiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Southern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CNShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNStanford University · USSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Occult peritoneal metastasis frequently occurs in patients with advanced gastric cancer and is poorly diagnosed with currently available tools. Because the presence of peritoneal metastasis precludes the possibility of curative surgery, there is an unmet need for a noninvasive approach to reliably identify patients with occult peritoneal metastasis. Objective: To assess the use of a deep learning model for predicting occult peritoneal metastasis based on preoperative computed tomography images. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, a deep convolutional neural network, the Peritoneal Metastasis Network (PMetNet), was trained to predict occult peritoneal metastasis based on preoperative computed tomography images. Data from a cohort of 1225 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (Guangzhou, China) were used for training purposes. To externally validate the model, data were collected from 2 independent cohorts comprising a total of 753 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital (Guangzhou, China) or the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China). The status of peritoneal metastasis for all patients was confirmed by pathological examination of pleural specimens obtained during surgery. Detailed clinicopathological data were collected for each patient. Data analysis was performed between September 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve were analyzed to evaluate performance in predicting occult peritoneal metastasis. Results: A total of 1978 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.0 [12.2] years; 1350 [68.3%] male) were included in the study. The PMetNet model achieved an AUC of 0.946 (95% CI, 0.927-0.965), with a sensitivity of 75.4% and a specificity of 92.9% in external validation cohort 1. In external validation cohort 2, the AUC was 0.920 (95% CI, 0.848-0.992), with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 98.2%. The discrimination performance of PMetNet was substantially higher than conventional clinicopathological factors (AUC range, 0.51-0.63). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, PMetNet was an independent predictor of occult peritoneal metastasis. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that the PMetNet model can serve as a reliable noninvasive tool for early identification of patients with clinically occult peritoneal metastasis, which will inform individualized preoperative treatment decision-making and may avoid unnecessary surgery and complications. These results warrant further validation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33399858
PMCPMC7786251
OpenAlexW3119742431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.