Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399857›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2021

Brain Responses to Noxious Stimuli in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anna Xu, Bart Larsen, Alina Henn, Erica B Baller, J Cobb Scott, Vaishnavi Sharma, Azeez Adebimpe, Allan I Basbaum, Gregory Corder, Robert H Dworkin and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Re-examining the Mysterious Role of the Cerebellum in Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Fractal Similarity of Pain Brain Networks.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna XuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Bart LarsenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Alina HennDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule) Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Erica B BallerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
J Cobb ScottDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Vaishnavi SharmaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Azeez AdebimpeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Allan I BasbaumDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco.
Gregory CorderDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Robert H DworkinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Robert R EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clifford J WoolfFM Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Claudia R EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour Sections, Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Theodore D SatterthwaiteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

From the spinal cord to the brain: Neurology of the pain and itch neuronsR35NS097306 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASBAUM, ALLAN I. · 2017 to 2024
$7.2M
SCHIZOPHRENIA: A NEUROPSYCHIATRIC PERSPECTIVET32MH019112 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 1990 to 2024
$6.2M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-PREDOCTORALT32MH014654 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BERRETTINI, WADE H · 1985 to 2021
$5.0M
Deconstructing the network mechanisms of chronic pain and reward in the amygdalaR00DA043609 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORDER, GREGORY · 2019 to 2021
$744k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA043609NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014654NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019112NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Functional neuroimaging is a valuable tool for understanding how patients with chronic pain respond to painful stimuli. However, past studies have reported heterogenous results, highlighting opportunities for a quantitative meta-analysis to integrate existing data and delineate consistent associations across studies. Objective: To identify differential brain responses to noxious stimuli in patients with chronic pain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while adhering to current best practices for neuroimaging meta-analyses. Data Sources: All fMRI experiments published from January 1, 1990, to May 28, 2019, were identified in a literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS. Study Selection: Experiments comparing brain responses to noxious stimuli in fMRI between patients and controls were selected if they reported whole-brain results, included at least 10 patients and 10 healthy control participants, and used adequate statistical thresholding (voxel-height P < .001 or cluster-corrected P < .05). Two independent reviewers evaluated titles and abstracts returned by the search. In total, 3682 abstracts were screened, and 1129 full-text articles were evaluated. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Thirty-seven experiments from 29 articles met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Coordinates reporting significant activation differences between patients with chronic pain and healthy controls were extracted. These data were meta-analyzed using activation likelihood estimation. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: A whole-brain meta-analysis evaluated whether reported differences in brain activation in response to noxious stimuli between patients and healthy controls were spatially convergent. Follow-up analyses examined the directionality of any differences. Finally, an exploratory (nonpreregistered) region-of-interest analysis examined differences within the pain network. Results: The 37 experiments from 29 unique articles included a total of 511 patients and 433 controls (944 participants). Whole-brain meta-analyses did not reveal significant differences between patients and controls in brain responses to noxious stimuli at the preregistered statistical threshold. However, exploratory analyses restricted to the pain network revealed aberrant activity in patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, preregistered, whole-brain analyses did not reveal aberrant fMRI activity in patients with chronic pain. Exploratory analyses suggested that subtle, spatially diffuse differences may exist within the pain network. Future work on chronic pain biomarkers may benefit from focus on this core set of pain-responsive areas.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingPhysical StimulationBrainBrain MappingChronic PainHumans

Identifiers

PMID33399857
PMCPMC7786252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.