Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398947›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2021

Adaptations in Anatomy Education during COVID-19.

Hyeijung Yoo, Dasom Kim, Young Mee Lee, Im Joo Rhyu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The use of 3D video in medical education: A scoping review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hyeijung Yoo *Department of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-5649
Dasom Kim *Practical Anatomy Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-3652
Young Mee LeeDepartment of Medial Education, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ymleehj@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4685-9465
Im Joo RhyuDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-6278
Korea University · KR

Funding

Korea University K1723261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has profoundly affected education, with most universities changing face-to-face classes to online formats. To adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic situation, we adopted a blended learning approach to anatomy instruction that included online lectures, pre-recorded laboratory dissection videos, and 3D anatomy applications, with condensed offline cadaver dissection.

methodsWe aimed to examine the learning outcomes of a newly adopted anatomy educational approach by 1) comparing academic achievement between the blended learning group (the 2020 class, 108 students) and the traditional classroom learning group (the 2019 class, 104 students), and 2) an online questionnaire survey on student preference on the learning method and reasons of preference.

resultsThe average anatomy examination scores of the 2020 class, who took online lectures and blended dissection laboratories, were significantly higher than those of the 2019 class, who participated in an offline lecture and dissection laboratories. The questionnaire survey revealed that students preferred online lectures over traditional large group lecture-based teaching because it allowed them to acquire increased self-study time, study according to their individual learning styles, and repeatedly review lecture videos.

conclusionThis study suggests that a blended learning approach is an effective method for anatomy learning, and the advantage may result from increased self-directed study through online learning.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Academic SuccessAnatomyCadaverComputer-Assisted InstructionCOVID-19HumansLearningOutcome Assessment, Health CareAnatomy EducationBlended LearningCOVID-19Self-directed Learning

Identifiers

PMID33398947
PMCPMC7781853
OpenAlexW3117431269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.