Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398914›Full record

Trial reportRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2021

Infection risk in sarcoidosis patients treated with methotrexate compared to azathioprine: A retrospective 'target trial' emulated with Swedish real-world data.

Marios Rossides, Susanna Kullberg, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Anders Eklund, Johan Grunewald, Johan Askling, Elizabeth V Arkema

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Infectious Complications of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. [Sarcoidosis and berylliosis].Der Internist · 2022
    Review
  16. Controversies in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marios RossidesClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9769-324X
Susanna KullbergRespiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniela Di GiuseppeClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders EklundRespiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan GrunewaldRespiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan AsklingClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elizabeth V ArkemaClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveNo clinical trial has examined the risk of infection associated methotrexate and azathioprine, two advocated treatments for sarcoidosis. We aimed to compare the 6-month risk of infection after the initiation of methotrexate or azathioprine.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective target trial emulation using Swedish pre-existing data. We searched for eligible participants who were dispensed methotrexate or azathioprine in the Prescribed Drug Register (PDR) every day between January 2007 and June 2013. Adults were eligible if they had ≥2 ICD-coded visits for sarcoidosis in the National Patient Register (NPR) and were dispensed ≥1 systemic corticosteroid but no methotrexate or azathioprine in the past 6 months (PDR). Within 6 months of methotrexate or azathioprine initiation, diagnosis of infectious disease was identified (visit in the NPR where infectious disease was the primary diagnosis). We estimated RR and risk differences comparing methotrexate (n = 667) to azathioprine initiations (n = 259) using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) adjusting for demographic factors, comorbidity and sarcoidosis severity proxies.

resultsThere were 43 infections in the methotrexate group (adjusted 6-month risk 6.8%) and 29 infections in the azathioprine group (12.0%). The RR for infectious disease at 6 months associated with methotrexate compared to azathioprine initiation was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.82) and the risk difference was -5.2% (95% CI: -8.5%, -1.8%). The RR at 9 months was attenuated to 0.77 (95% CI: 0.52, 1.14).

conclusionMethotrexate appears to be associated with a lower risk of infection in sarcoidosis than azathioprine, but randomized trials should confirm this finding.

Indexed as

AzathioprineSarcoidosisAdultFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexateRetrospective StudiesSwedenAzathioprineImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexateazathioprineinfectionmethotrexateregistrysarcoidosistrial emulation

Identifiers

PMID33398914
PMCPMC8247001
OpenAlexW3120952784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.