Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398822›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

Optogenetics in Drosophila.

Hiroshi Kohsaka, Akinao Nose

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiroshi KohsakaDepartment of Complexity Science and Engineering, University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha, Chiba, Japan. kohsaka@edu.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Akinao NoseDepartment of Complexity Science and Engineering, University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, an insect 4 mm long, has served as the experimental subject in a wide range of biological research, including neuroscience. In this chapter, we briefly introduce optogenetic applications in Drosophila neuroscience research. First, we describe the development of Drosophila from egg to adult. In fly neuroscience, temperature-controlled perturbation of neural activity, sometimes called "thermogenetics," has been an invaluable tool that predates the advent of optogenetics. After briefly introducing this perturbation technique, we describe the process of generating transgenic flies that express optogenetic probes in a specific group of cells. Transgenic techniques are crucial in the application of optogenetics in Drosophila neuroscience; here we introduce the transposon P-elements, ϕC31 integrase, and CRISPR-Cas9 methods. As for cell-specific gene expression techniques, the binary expression systems utilizing Gal4-UAS, LexA-lexAop, and Q-system are described. We also present a short and basic optogenetic experiment with Drosophila larvae as a practical example. Finally, we review a few recent studies in Drosophila neuroscience that made use of optogenetics. In this overview of fly development, transgenic methods, and applications of optogenetics, we present an introductory background to optogenetics in Drosophila.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila ProteinsNeurosciencesOptogeneticsDrosophila ProteinsCRISPR-Cas9 locomotionDrosophilaMotor circuitsP-elementThermogeneticsTransgenic flyφC31 integrase

Identifiers

PMID33398822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.