Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398773›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.

Alessandro Ussia, Samuele Vaccari, Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Riccardo Ussia, Lodovico Sartarelli, Margherita Minghetti, Augusto Lauro, Paolo Barbieri, S Di Saverio and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandro UssiaEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Samuele VaccariDepartment of Surgical Sciences, La Sapienza University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Gaetano GalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Catanzaro, Italy. gallog@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-4671
Ugo GrossiIV Surgery Unit, Tertiary Referral Pelvic Floor Center, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Treviso, Italy.
Riccardo UssiaEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Lodovico SartarelliEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Margherita MinghettiEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Augusto LauroEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo BarbieriCenter for Health Economics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
S Di SaverioDepartment of General Surgery, University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, Varese, Italy.
Maurizio CervelleraEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Valeria ToniniEmergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical training is essential to maintain safety standards in healthcare. The aim of this study is to evaluate learning curves and short-term postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed by trainees (TRN) and attendings (ATT). The present study included the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis who underwent a fully LA in our department between January 2013 and December 2018. Cases were divided into trainees (TRN and ATT groups based on the experience of the operating surgeon. The primary outcome measures were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Preoperative patients' clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, operative times, and postoperative hospitalization were compared. Operative times were used to extrapolate learning curves and evaluate the effects of changes in faculty using CUSUM charts. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce differences between cohorts regarding both preoperative characteristics and intraoperative findings. A total of 1173 patients undergoing LA for acute appendicitis were included, of whom 521 (45%) in the TRN group and 652 (55%) in the ATT group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of complication rates, operative times and length of hospital stay. However, CUSUM chart analysis showed decreased operating times in the TRN group. Operative times improved more quickly for advanced cases. The results of this study indicate that LA can be performed by trainees without detrimental effects on clinical outcomes, procedural safety, and operative times. However, the learning curve is longer than previously acknowledged.

Indexed as

Learning CurveAcute DiseaseAdultAppendectomyAppendicitisEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePropensity ScoreSafetySurgeonsTime FactorsClinical outcomesCUSUM analysisLaparoscopic appendectomyLearning curveSurgical TrainingTrainees

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.