ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Environmental burden of unprocessed solid waste handling in Enugu State, Nigeria.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of plastic waste circular actions in seven developing countries to achieve sustainable development goals.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2024Review
- Adsorption capacity of composite bio-modified geopolymer for multi-component heavy metal system: optimisation, equilibrium and kinetics study.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improper waste management has assumed a worrisome dimension in cities across many developing countries. One of its commonest features is open dumps. Open dumps in Enugu and Nsukka were investigated in this study. Waste samples were collected from ten dumps located in low-income, low-to-middle income, and high-income zones of the study area. The composition of waste was determined following standard methods and results obtained subjected to statistical analyses. Selected open dumps were subjected to detailed inspection in order to identify possible environmental impacts. Soil samples were also collected from the top soil and subsoil (15 cm) of selected dumps and analyzed for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Pb, Ni, Cd, and Zn. The sources of contamination were determined using the principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA). Results of heavy metal analyses were used to determine extent of soil pollution. Food waste ranged from 29.6 to 56.5% with an average of 42.2%. Analysis along income line showed a decline in the proportion of food and rubber waste from lower to high income. The order of heavy metals concentration in waste dump soils investigated was as follows: Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Pb > As > Ni > Cd > Hg. The pollution indices (PI) of the dumpsites ranged from 1.87 for Ni to 1634.6 for Cu in the topsoil, and 0.62 for Ni to 1354.74 for Cu in the subsoil, indicating a severe level of pollution. Pollution load index (PLI) ranged from 25.38 to 75.07 with a mean of 60.75 for the dump surface and from 51.46 to 21.7 with a mean of 33.86 below the dump soil. Forty-three percent (43%) of the topsoil and 40% of the subsoil exhibited ecological risk index values greater than 320, indicating extreme degree of ecological risk. The first principal and second principal components with 36% and 28.2% variance respectively represent the growing impact of electronic waste disposal, specifically mobile phones, personal computers, and other potable electronic devices with short life span on waste dumps. The third principal component (10.2%) represents input from households and other forms of chemicals such as insecticides, paints, and detergents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33398762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.