Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398762›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Environmental burden of unprocessed solid waste handling in Enugu State, Nigeria.

Cordelia Nnennaya Mama, Chidozie Charles Nnaji, John P Nnam, Opata C Opata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review of plastic waste circular actions in seven developing countries to achieve sustainable development goals.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cordelia Nnennaya MamaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, 410001, Nigeria.
Chidozie Charles NnajiDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, 410001, Nigeria. chidozie.nnaji@unn.edu.ng.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-6978
John P NnamDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Technology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Opata C OpataDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, 410001, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improper waste management has assumed a worrisome dimension in cities across many developing countries. One of its commonest features is open dumps. Open dumps in Enugu and Nsukka were investigated in this study. Waste samples were collected from ten dumps located in low-income, low-to-middle income, and high-income zones of the study area. The composition of waste was determined following standard methods and results obtained subjected to statistical analyses. Selected open dumps were subjected to detailed inspection in order to identify possible environmental impacts. Soil samples were also collected from the top soil and subsoil (15 cm) of selected dumps and analyzed for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Pb, Ni, Cd, and Zn. The sources of contamination were determined using the principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA). Results of heavy metal analyses were used to determine extent of soil pollution. Food waste ranged from 29.6 to 56.5% with an average of 42.2%. Analysis along income line showed a decline in the proportion of food and rubber waste from lower to high income. The order of heavy metals concentration in waste dump soils investigated was as follows: Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Pb > As > Ni > Cd > Hg. The pollution indices (PI) of the dumpsites ranged from 1.87 for Ni to 1634.6 for Cu in the topsoil, and 0.62 for Ni to 1354.74 for Cu in the subsoil, indicating a severe level of pollution. Pollution load index (PLI) ranged from 25.38 to 75.07 with a mean of 60.75 for the dump surface and from 51.46 to 21.7 with a mean of 33.86 below the dump soil. Forty-three percent (43%) of the topsoil and 40% of the subsoil exhibited ecological risk index values greater than 320, indicating extreme degree of ecological risk. The first principal and second principal components with 36% and 28.2% variance respectively represent the growing impact of electronic waste disposal, specifically mobile phones, personal computers, and other potable electronic devices with short life span on waste dumps. The third principal component (10.2%) represents input from households and other forms of chemicals such as insecticides, paints, and detergents.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyRefuse DisposalSoil PollutantsChinaCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringFoodNigeriaRisk AssessmentSoilSolid WasteMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsSolid WasteEnvironmental impactGroundwaterLeachateOpen dumpingPollution;Soil contamination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.