Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398679›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2021

A protocol for umbilical cord tissue cryopreservation as a source of mesenchymal stem cells.

Diego Raffo, Andrea Maglioco, Diego Fernandez Sasso

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego RaffoCriocenter SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina. draffo@cedie.org.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-730X
Andrea MagliocoUniversidad Abierta Interamericana (UAI), Centro de Altos Estudios en Ciencias Humanas y de la Salud (CAECIHS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Diego Fernandez SassoCriocenter SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) differentiate into different cell types and have immunomodulatory and paracrine effects. Cryopreservation of umbilical cord tissue as a source of MSC is very promising for regenerative medicine. We aim to evaluate a protocol for cryopreserving this tissue sectioned into small fragments with viable MSC. A total of 723 samples were frozen, thawed and cultured to obtain primary cultures of MSC. These were followed until 90-100% confluence and flow cytometric analysis were performed to confirm the mesenchymal phenotype. Samples in which protocol alterations at the collection of the samples were reported, were excluded for microbial contamination analysis leaving a total of 634 samples composed of 181 vaginal and 453 cesarean births. All cultures reach confluence with a media of 22.57 days and 97% in 28 or fewer days. Evaluated cultures showed low percentage of CD45+ and high of CD73 and CD90. Eight samples were subcultured 4 or 5 times and differentiated to chondrocytes and osteocytes to test differentiation potential with positive results. Umbilical cord tissue collections showed similar microbial profile and risk factors to those reported of umbilical cord blood collections, but with higher contamination frequencies. Cryopreserved tissue samples had viable cells that can be expanded without losing differentiation potential. Higher contamination frequencies compared to umbilical cord blood collection are not surprising, however, microbial load and survival of microorganisms to cryopreservation are expected to be lower.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationChondrocytesCryopreservationFetal BloodHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteocytesRegenerative MedicineUmbilical CordExplant methodMesenchymal stem cellsMicrobial analysisUmbilical cord tissue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.